Olmo 3 7B Think vs Gemma 4 E2B
At a Glance
| Compare | Gemma 4 E2BGoogle DeepMind | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 66K | 131K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Olmo-3-7B-Think | Gemma 4 E2B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Ai2 | Google DeepMind |
| Family | Olmo 3 7b Think | Gemma 4 |
| Model | Olmo-3-7B-Think | Gemma 4 E2B |
| Version | Olmo-3-7B-Think | Gemma 4 E2B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-03-02 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 66K | 131K |
| Total parameters | 7.3B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Unknown | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Unknown | Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Olmo 3 7B Think Capabilities
Gemma 4 E2B Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Olmo 3 7B Think vs Gemma 4 E2B FAQs
Is Olmo 3 7B Think or Gemma 4 E2B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Olmo 3 7B Think and Gemma 4 E2B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Olmo 3 7B Think or Gemma 4 E2B?+
Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.
Which has a larger context window, Olmo 3 7B Think or Gemma 4 E2B?+
Gemma 4 E2B has the larger sourced context window. Olmo 3 7B Think supports 66K and Gemma 4 E2B supports 131K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Olmo 3 7B Think or Gemma 4 E2B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Olmo 3 7B Think or Gemma 4 E2B be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Olmo 3 7B Think is open weight; Gemma 4 E2B is open weight.
Can Olmo 3 7B Think and Gemma 4 E2B understand images?+
Olmo 3 7B Think is not documented with image input; Gemma 4 E2B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Olmo 3 7B Think or Gemma 4 E2B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Olmo 3 7B Think is 33K and Gemma 4 E2B is —.
Do Olmo 3 7B Think and Gemma 4 E2B support reasoning and tool use?+
Olmo 3 7B Think: reasoning. Gemma 4 E2B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Olmo 3 7B Think or Gemma 4 E2B?+
Olmo 3 7B Think has 0 sourced provider routes; Gemma 4 E2B has 1, so Gemma 4 E2B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Olmo 3 7B Think or Gemma 4 E2B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.