Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
At a Glance
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.40Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.40Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 66K | 131K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Olmo-3.1-32B-Instruct | Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-10-15-a64ca3b12b6e · arena_rating · leader | 1,311.14100% of row best · rating · olmo-3.1-32b-instruct; 95% CI [1305.04954142, 1317.22764633]; votes 11817; rank 242 | 1,260.8796% of row best · rating · llama-3.1-70b-instruct; 95% CI [1257.15696595, 1264.58148679]; votes 55240; rank 290 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Olmo-3.1-32B-Instruct | Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Ai2 | Meta |
| Family | Olmo 3 1 32b Instruct | Llama 3 1 70b Instruct |
| Model | Olmo-3.1-32B-Instruct | Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct |
| Version | Olmo-3.1-32B-Instruct | Llama-3.1-70B-Instruct |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2024-07-23 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 66K | 131K |
| Total parameters | 32.2B | 70.6B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | llama3.1 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Unknown | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Unknown | Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | chat, generation, tools |
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct Capabilities
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs | cross-developer peerstext | ||
| vs | family variantstext | ||
| vs | family variantstext | ||
| vs | family variantstext | ||
| vs | cross-developer peerstext | ||
| vs |  Llama-3.1-70BMeta | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Muse Glimmer 30BMeta | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Codestral-22B-v0.1Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Devstral-2-123B-Instruct-2512Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Ministral-8B-Instruct-2410Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  gpt-oss-20bOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct FAQs
Is Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?+
Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has a directly sourced input price: $0.40 per million tokens. Only Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has a directly sourced output price: $0.40 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has the larger sourced context window. Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct supports 65,536 tokens and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct supports 131,072 tokens.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct is open weight; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is open weight.
Can Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct understand images?+
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct is not documented with image input; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?+
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct has a sourced maximum output of 32,768 tokens; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct's maximum output is not reported. A larger limit cannot be determined.
Do Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct and Llama 3.1 70B Instruct support reasoning and tool use?+
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct: tool calling. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?+
Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct has 0 sourced provider routes; Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has 1, so Llama 3.1 70B Instruct has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct or Llama 3.1 70B Instruct?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.