NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 vs Qwen3 VL Flash

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
NVIDIA · activeNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16Verified Aug 28, 2026
Qwen · activeQwen3 VL FlashVerified Sep 3, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16Qwen3 VL Flash
DeveloperNVIDIAQwen
FamilyNvidia Nemotron 3 Ultra 550b A55b Bf16Qwen3 VL
ModelNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16Qwen3 VL Flash
VersionNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16Qwen3 VL Flash
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-06-042026-01-22
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K262K
Total parameters560.5BUnknown
Active parameters55BUnknown
LicenseotherUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessFireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

14 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$0.50
Output price$2.20
Serving providers3
Canonical IDnvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16

Qwen3 VL Flash Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Input price$0.15
Output price$1.50
Serving providers1
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3-vl-flash

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 vs Qwen3 VL Flash FAQs

Is NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 or Qwen3 VL Flash better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 and Qwen3 VL Flash, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 or Qwen3 VL Flash?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is $0.50 and Qwen3 VL Flash is $0.15 per million tokens, so Qwen3 VL Flash is cheaper on this metric. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is $2.20 and Qwen3 VL Flash is $1.50 per million tokens, so Qwen3 VL Flash is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 or Qwen3 VL Flash?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is 262K and Qwen3 VL Flash is 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 or Qwen3 VL Flash?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 or Qwen3 VL Flash be self-hosted?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is open weight; Qwen3 VL Flash is not marked open weight.

Can NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 and Qwen3 VL Flash understand images?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is not documented with image input; Qwen3 VL Flash is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 or Qwen3 VL Flash?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is — and Qwen3 VL Flash is —.

Do NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 and Qwen3 VL Flash support reasoning and tool use?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16: reasoning and tool calling. Qwen3 VL Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 or Qwen3 VL Flash?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 has 3 sourced provider routes; Qwen3 VL Flash has 1, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 or Qwen3 VL Flash?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback