NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 vs GPT-5.2

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
NVIDIA · activeNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16Verified Aug 28, 2026
OpenAI · activeGPT-5.2Verified Sep 3, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16GPT-5.2
DeveloperNVIDIAOpenAI
FamilyNvidia Nemotron 3 Nano 30b A3b Base Bf16Gpt 5 2
ModelNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16GPT-5.2
VersionNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16GPT-5.2
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-12-152025-12-11
Knowledge cutoff2025-06-252025-08-31
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262,144400,000
Total parameters31,577,937,344Unknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseotherUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownOpenai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitiesgenerationchat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

13 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 Capabilities

generation
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDnvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16

GPT-5.2 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$1.75
Output price$14.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-5.2

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vsfamily variantstext
vscross-developer peerstext

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 vs GPT-5.2 FAQs

Is NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 or GPT-5.2 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 and GPT-5.2, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 or GPT-5.2?+

Only GPT-5.2 has a directly sourced input price: $1.75 per million tokens. Only GPT-5.2 has a directly sourced output price: $14.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 or GPT-5.2?+

GPT-5.2 has the larger sourced context window. NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 supports 262,144 and GPT-5.2 supports 400,000.

Which performs better in benchmarks, NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 or GPT-5.2?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 or GPT-5.2 be self-hosted?+

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 is open weight; GPT-5.2 is not marked open weight.

Can NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 and GPT-5.2 understand images?+

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 is not documented with image input; GPT-5.2 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 or GPT-5.2?+

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 has the larger sourced maximum output: NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 supports 131,072 and GPT-5.2 supports 128,000 output tokens.

Do NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 and GPT-5.2 support reasoning and tool use?+

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16: none of these features are definitively sourced. GPT-5.2: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 or GPT-5.2?+

NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 has 0 sourced provider routes; GPT-5.2 has 2, so GPT-5.2 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B-Base-BF16 or GPT-5.2?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback