Nova 2 Lite vs Claude Opus 4.7
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | Nova 2 Lite | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2 | UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort | #6 of 2278.9 score |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort | #31 of 36$0.286 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0 | UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort | #12 of 2251.8 score |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,362.5292% of row best · rating · nova-2-lite; 95% CI [1356.44886287, 1368.59662424]; votes 12117; rank 178 | 1,483.21100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-7; 95% CI [1479.33960820, 1487.07067536]; votes 61256; rank 10 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 1 benchmark winOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Nova 2 Lite | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Amazon | Anthropic |
| Family | Nova 2 | Claude 4 |
| Model | Nova 2 Lite | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Version | Nova 2 Lite | Claude Opus 4.7 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-12-02 | 2026-04-16 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-10-01 | 2026-01-01 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Document | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Amazon Bedrock (Standard) | Anthropic (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, prompt-caching, tools, vision | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
15 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Nova 2 Lite Capabilities
Claude Opus 4.7 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Nova 2 LiteAmazon | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Nova 2 Lite vs Claude Opus 4.7 FAQs
Is Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.7 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Nova 2 Lite and Claude Opus 4.7, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.7?+
Nova 2 Lite is $0.30 and Claude Opus 4.7 is $5.00 per million tokens, so Nova 2 Lite is cheaper on this metric. Nova 2 Lite is $2.50 and Claude Opus 4.7 is $25.00 per million tokens, so Nova 2 Lite is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.7?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Nova 2 Lite is 1,000K and Claude Opus 4.7 is 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.7?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.7 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Nova 2 Lite is not marked open weight; Claude Opus 4.7 is not marked open weight.
Can Nova 2 Lite and Claude Opus 4.7 understand images?+
Nova 2 Lite is documented with image input; Claude Opus 4.7 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.7?+
Claude Opus 4.7 has the larger sourced maximum output: Nova 2 Lite supports 66K and Claude Opus 4.7 supports 128K output tokens.
Do Nova 2 Lite and Claude Opus 4.7 support reasoning and tool use?+
Nova 2 Lite: tool calling and image input. Claude Opus 4.7: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.7?+
Nova 2 Lite has 1 sourced provider route; Claude Opus 4.7 has 2, so Claude Opus 4.7 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.7?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.