Nova 2 Lite vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
At a Glance
| Compare |  Nova 2 LiteAmazon | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.30Amazon Bedrock ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $0.10Openrouter ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $2.50Amazon Bedrock ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $0.32Openrouter ↗ · Sep 23, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 131K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboardv4-ede5081a24bc · overall_accuracy · leader | 27.1085% of row best · percent · Amazon-Nova-2-Lite-v1:0 (FC) | 31.90100% of row best · percent · Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct (FC) |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,362.62100% of row best · rating · nova-2-lite; 95% CI [1356.54933238, 1368.69109380]; votes 12120; rank 182 | 1,273.9893% of row best · rating · llama-3.3-70b-instruct; 95% CI [1270.49383309, 1277.45726344]; votes 54412; rank 262 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Nova 2 Lite | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Amazon | Meta |
| Family | Nova 2 | Llama 3 3 70b Instruct |
| Model | Nova 2 Lite | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct |
| Version | Nova 2 Lite | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-12-02 | 2024-12-06 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-10-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Document | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 131K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 70.6B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | llama3.3 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Amazon Bedrock (Standard) | Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, prompt-caching, tools, vision | chat, generation, tools |
Nova 2 Lite Capabilities
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Nova 2 LiteAmazon | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Nova 2 Lite vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct FAQs
Is Nova 2 Lite or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Nova 2 Lite and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+
Nova 2 Lite is $0.30 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is $0.10 per million tokens, so Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is cheaper on this metric. Nova 2 Lite is $2.50 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is $0.32 per million tokens, so Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Nova 2 Lite or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+
Nova 2 Lite has the larger sourced context window. Nova 2 Lite supports 1,000K and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct supports 131K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Nova 2 Lite or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: The verified common benchmarks do not produce a majority winner.
Can Nova 2 Lite or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct be self-hosted?+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Nova 2 Lite is not marked open weight; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is open weight.
Can Nova 2 Lite and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct understand images?+
Nova 2 Lite is documented with image input; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Nova 2 Lite or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Nova 2 Lite is 66K and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is —.
Do Nova 2 Lite and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct support reasoning and tool use?+
Nova 2 Lite: tool calling and image input. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Nova 2 Lite or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+
Nova 2 Lite has 1 sourced provider route; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has 3, so Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Nova 2 Lite or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.