Nova 2 Lite vs Gemma 4 31B
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,362.5295% of row best · rating · nova-2-lite; 95% CI [1356.44886287, 1368.59662424]; votes 12117; rank 178 | 1,441.82100% of row best · rating · gemma-4-31b; 95% CI [1434.27306811, 1449.35895578]; votes 5900; rank 60 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 1 benchmark winOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Nova 2 Lite | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Amazon | Google DeepMind |
| Family | Nova 2 | Gemma 4 |
| Model | Nova 2 Lite | Gemma 4 31B |
| Version | Nova 2 Lite | Gemma 4 31B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-12-02 | 2026-03-11 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-10-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Document | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 262K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 31B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Amazon Bedrock (Standard) | Cerebras (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, prompt-caching, tools, vision | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
14 comparable fields · 11 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Nova 2 Lite Capabilities
Gemma 4 31B Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs | Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs | Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | cross-developer peerstext |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Nova 2 LiteAmazon | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Nova 2 LiteAmazon | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Nova 2 Lite vs Gemma 4 31B FAQs
Is Nova 2 Lite or Gemma 4 31B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Nova 2 Lite and Gemma 4 31B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Gemma 4 31B?+
Nova 2 Lite is $0.30 and Gemma 4 31B is $0.090 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on this metric. Nova 2 Lite is $2.50 and Gemma 4 31B is $0.34 per million tokens, so Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Nova 2 Lite or Gemma 4 31B?+
Nova 2 Lite has the larger sourced context window. Nova 2 Lite supports 1,000K and Gemma 4 31B supports 262K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Nova 2 Lite or Gemma 4 31B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Nova 2 Lite or Gemma 4 31B be self-hosted?+
Gemma 4 31B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Nova 2 Lite is not marked open weight; Gemma 4 31B is open weight.
Can Nova 2 Lite and Gemma 4 31B understand images?+
Nova 2 Lite is documented with image input; Gemma 4 31B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Nova 2 Lite or Gemma 4 31B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Nova 2 Lite is 66K and Gemma 4 31B is —.
Do Nova 2 Lite and Gemma 4 31B support reasoning and tool use?+
Nova 2 Lite: tool calling and image input. Gemma 4 31B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Nova 2 Lite or Gemma 4 31B?+
Nova 2 Lite has 1 sourced provider route; Gemma 4 31B has 5, so Gemma 4 31B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Nova 2 Lite or Gemma 4 31B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.