Nova 2 Lite vs Claude Opus 4.5
At a Glance
| Compare | Nova 2 LiteAmazon | Claude Opus 4.5Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5 | UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort | #27 of 4655.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 36.9–70.3 |
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort | #40 of 44$0.380 per LiveBench case |
| EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5 | UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort | #36 of 3838.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 28.8–45.4 |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.30Amazon Bedrock ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $5.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $2.50Amazon Bedrock ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | $25.00Anthropic ↗ · Sep 3, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 200K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Nova 2 Lite | Claude Opus 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboardv4-ede5081a24bc · overall_accuracy · leader | 27.1081% of row best · percent · Amazon-Nova-2-Lite-v1:0 (FC) | 33.47100% of row best · percent · Claude-Opus-4-5-20251101 (Prompt) |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,362.6294% of row best · rating · nova-2-lite; 95% CI [1356.54933238, 1368.69109380]; votes 12120; rank 182 | 1,447.08100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-5-20251101-high-32k; 95% CI [1443.17965746, 1450.98398333]; votes 36239; rank 49 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 2 benchmark winsOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Nova 2 Lite | Claude Opus 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Amazon | Anthropic |
| Family | Nova 2 | Claude 4 |
| Model | Nova 2 Lite | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Version | Nova 2 Lite | Claude Opus 4.5 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-12-02 | 2025-11-24 |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-10-01 | 2025-05-01 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Document | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 200K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Amazon Bedrock (Standard) | Anthropic (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, prompt-caching, tools, vision | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
Nova 2 Lite Capabilities
Claude Opus 4.5 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Nova 2 Lite vs Claude Opus 4.5 FAQs
Is Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.5 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Nova 2 Lite and Claude Opus 4.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.5?+
Nova 2 Lite is $0.30 and Claude Opus 4.5 is $5.00 per million tokens, so Nova 2 Lite is cheaper on this metric. Nova 2 Lite is $2.50 and Claude Opus 4.5 is $25.00 per million tokens, so Nova 2 Lite is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.5?+
Nova 2 Lite has the larger sourced context window. Nova 2 Lite supports 1,000K and Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.5?+
Claude Opus 4.5 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 2 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.
Can Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.5 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Nova 2 Lite is not marked open weight; Claude Opus 4.5 is not marked open weight.
Can Nova 2 Lite and Claude Opus 4.5 understand images?+
Nova 2 Lite is documented with image input; Claude Opus 4.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.5?+
Nova 2 Lite has the larger sourced maximum output: Nova 2 Lite supports 66K and Claude Opus 4.5 supports 64K output tokens.
Do Nova 2 Lite and Claude Opus 4.5 support reasoning and tool use?+
Nova 2 Lite: tool calling and image input. Claude Opus 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.5?+
Nova 2 Lite has 1 sourced provider route; Claude Opus 4.5 has 1, a tie.
Which offers better value, Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.5?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.