Nova 2 Lite vs Claude Opus 4.5

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#27 of 4655.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 36.9–70.3
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#40 of 44$0.380 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#36 of 3838.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 28.8–45.4
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.30Amazon Bedrock · Aug 29, 2026$5.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$2.50Amazon Bedrock · Aug 29, 2026$25.00Anthropic · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,000K200K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteClaude Opus 4.5
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboardv4-ede5081a24bc · overall_accuracy · leader27.1081% of row best · percent · Amazon-Nova-2-Lite-v1:0 (FC)33.47100% of row best · percent · Claude-Opus-4-5-20251101 (Prompt)
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,362.6294% of row best · rating · nova-2-lite; 95% CI [1356.54933238, 1368.69109380]; votes 12120; rank 1821,447.08100% of row best · rating · claude-opus-4-5-20251101-high-32k; 95% CI [1443.17965746, 1450.98398333]; votes 36239; rank 49
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins2 benchmark winsOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldNova 2 LiteClaude Opus 4.5
DeveloperAmazonAnthropic
FamilyNova 2Claude 4
ModelNova 2 LiteClaude Opus 4.5
VersionNova 2 LiteClaude Opus 4.5
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-12-022025-11-24
Knowledge cutoff2025-10-012025-05-01
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, DocumentText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,000K200K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessAmazon Bedrock (Standard)Anthropic (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, prompt-caching, tools, visionchat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Nova 2 Lite Capabilities

chatgenerationprompt-cachingtoolsvision
Serving providers1
Canonical IDamazon/nova-2-lite-v1:0

Claude Opus 4.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDanthropic/claude-opus-4-5

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Nova 2 Lite vs Claude Opus 4.5 FAQs

Is Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.5 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Nova 2 Lite and Claude Opus 4.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.5?+

Nova 2 Lite is $0.30 and Claude Opus 4.5 is $5.00 per million tokens, so Nova 2 Lite is cheaper on this metric. Nova 2 Lite is $2.50 and Claude Opus 4.5 is $25.00 per million tokens, so Nova 2 Lite is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.5?+

Nova 2 Lite has the larger sourced context window. Nova 2 Lite supports 1,000K and Claude Opus 4.5 supports 200K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.5?+

Claude Opus 4.5 leads the current overall benchmark count. The result uses 2 protocol-matched benchmarks from 2 publishers; it is not a universal quality score.

Can Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.5 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Nova 2 Lite is not marked open weight; Claude Opus 4.5 is not marked open weight.

Can Nova 2 Lite and Claude Opus 4.5 understand images?+

Nova 2 Lite is documented with image input; Claude Opus 4.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.5?+

Nova 2 Lite has the larger sourced maximum output: Nova 2 Lite supports 66K and Claude Opus 4.5 supports 64K output tokens.

Do Nova 2 Lite and Claude Opus 4.5 support reasoning and tool use?+

Nova 2 Lite: tool calling and image input. Claude Opus 4.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.5?+

Nova 2 Lite has 1 sourced provider route; Claude Opus 4.5 has 1, a tie.

Which offers better value, Nova 2 Lite or Claude Opus 4.5?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback