Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 vs Kimi K2.5

At a Glance

Compare
Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.45Deepinfra · Aug 29, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$2.25Deepinfra · Aug 29, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K262K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldMinistral-3-3B-Base-2512Kimi-K2.5
DeveloperMistral AIMoonshot AI
FamilyMinistral 3 3b Base 2512Kimi K2 5
ModelMinistral-3-3B-Base-2512Kimi-K2.5
VersionMinistral-3-3B-Base-2512Kimi-K2.5
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2026-01-27
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K262K
Total parameters4.3B1T
Active parametersUnknown32B
Licenseapache-2.0other
Open weightsYesYes
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessUnknownDeepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitiesgenerationchat, generation, reasoning, tools

Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 Capabilities

generation
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmistralai/Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512

Kimi K2.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K2.5

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 vs Kimi K2.5 FAQs

Is Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 or Kimi K2.5 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 and Kimi K2.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 or Kimi K2.5?+

Only Kimi K2.5 has a directly sourced input price: $0.45 per million tokens. Only Kimi K2.5 has a directly sourced output price: $2.25 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 or Kimi K2.5?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 is 262K and Kimi K2.5 is 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 or Kimi K2.5?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 or Kimi K2.5 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 is open weight; Kimi K2.5 is open weight.

Can Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 and Kimi K2.5 understand images?+

Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 is documented with image input; Kimi K2.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 or Kimi K2.5?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 is — and Kimi K2.5 is —.

Do Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 and Kimi K2.5 support reasoning and tool use?+

Ministral 3 3B Base 2512: image input. Kimi K2.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 or Kimi K2.5?+

Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 has 0 sourced provider routes; Kimi K2.5 has 3, so Kimi K2.5 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 or Kimi K2.5?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback