Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 vs GLM 5.2

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#23 of 4661.9 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 41.3–74.6
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#12 of 44$0.056 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#7 of 3861.3 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 51.0–67.6
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.75Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$2.40Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldMinistral-3-3B-Base-2512GLM-5.2
DeveloperMistral AIZ.ai
FamilyMinistral 3 3b Base 2512Glm 5 2
ModelMinistral-3-3B-Base-2512GLM-5.2
VersionMinistral-3-3B-Base-2512GLM-5.2
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknownUnknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K1,049K
Total parameters4.3B753.3B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0mit
Open weightsYesYes
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessUnknownDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitiesgenerationchat, generation, reasoning, tools

Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 Capabilities

generation
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmistralai/Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512

GLM 5.2 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers5
Canonical IDzai-org/GLM-5.2

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 vs GLM 5.2 FAQs

Is Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 or GLM 5.2 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 and GLM 5.2, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 or GLM 5.2?+

Only GLM 5.2 has a directly sourced input price: $0.75 per million tokens. Only GLM 5.2 has a directly sourced output price: $2.40 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 or GLM 5.2?+

GLM 5.2 has the larger sourced context window. Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 supports 262K and GLM 5.2 supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 or GLM 5.2?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 or GLM 5.2 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 is open weight; GLM 5.2 is open weight.

Can Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 and GLM 5.2 understand images?+

Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 is documented with image input; GLM 5.2 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 or GLM 5.2?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 is — and GLM 5.2 is —.

Do Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 and GLM 5.2 support reasoning and tool use?+

Ministral 3 3B Base 2512: image input. GLM 5.2: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 or GLM 5.2?+

Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 has 0 sourced provider routes; GLM 5.2 has 5, so GLM 5.2 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Ministral 3 3B Base 2512 or GLM 5.2?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback