MiniMax-M3 vs Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | MiniMax-M3 | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | MiniMax | Meta |
| Family | Minimax M3 | Llama 4 Maverick 17b 128e |
| Model | MiniMax-M3 | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E |
| Version | MiniMax-M3 | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-06-01 | 2025-04-05 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,048,576 | 1,000,000 |
| Total parameters | 427,040,140,160 | 401,583,781,376 |
| Active parameters | 23,000,000,000 | 17,000,000,000 |
| License | other | other |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Unknown |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | chat, generation, tools |
15 comparable fields · 9 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
MiniMax-M3 Capabilities
Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
| vs | family variantsimage, text | ||
| vs | family variantsimage, text | ||
| vs | family variantsimage, text | ||
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs |  Mistral-Small-4-119B-2603Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs | Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Fable 5Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Opus 5Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic | cross-developer peersimage, text |
| vs | Ministral-3-14B-Instruct-2512Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
MiniMax-M3 vs Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E FAQs
Is MiniMax-M3 or Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both MiniMax-M3 and Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M3 or Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E?+
Only MiniMax-M3 has a directly sourced input price: $0.28 per million tokens. Only MiniMax-M3 has a directly sourced output price: $1.10 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, MiniMax-M3 or Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E?+
MiniMax-M3 has the larger sourced context window. MiniMax-M3 supports 1,048,576 and Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E supports 1,000,000.
Which performs better in benchmarks, MiniMax-M3 or Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can MiniMax-M3 or Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. MiniMax-M3 is open weight; Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E is open weight.
Can MiniMax-M3 and Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E understand images?+
MiniMax-M3 is documented with image input; Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, MiniMax-M3 or Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. MiniMax-M3 is — and Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E is —.
Do MiniMax-M3 and Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E support reasoning and tool use?+
MiniMax-M3: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, MiniMax-M3 or Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E?+
MiniMax-M3 has 2 sourced provider routes; Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E has 0, so MiniMax-M3 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, MiniMax-M3 or Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.