MiniMax M2.7 vs MiMo V2.6 Pro

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.25Deepinfra · Sep 3, 2026$0.435Openrouter · Sep 23, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$1.00Deepinfra · Sep 3, 2026$0.87Openrouter · Sep 23, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens205K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 22, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldMiniMax-M2.7MiMo-V2.6-Pro
DeveloperMiniMaxXiaomi
FamilyMinimax M2 7Mimo V2 6
ModelMiniMax-M2.7MiMo-V2.6-Pro
VersionMiniMax-M2.7MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-03-182026-09-21
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window205K1,049K
Total parameters228.7B1T
Active parametersUnknown42B
LicenseotherMIT
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Openrouter (Standard), Xiaomi MiMo (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

MiniMax M2.7 Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers5
Canonical IDMiniMaxAI/MiniMax-M2.7

MiMo V2.6 Pro Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDxiaomi/mimo-v2.6-pro

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

MiniMax M2.7 vs MiMo V2.6 Pro FAQs

Is MiniMax M2.7 or MiMo V2.6 Pro better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both MiniMax M2.7 and MiMo V2.6 Pro, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax M2.7 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+

MiniMax M2.7 is $0.25 and MiMo V2.6 Pro is $0.435 per million tokens, so MiniMax M2.7 is cheaper on this metric. MiniMax M2.7 is $1.00 and MiMo V2.6 Pro is $0.87 per million tokens, so MiMo V2.6 Pro is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, MiniMax M2.7 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+

MiMo V2.6 Pro has the larger sourced context window. MiniMax M2.7 supports 205K and MiMo V2.6 Pro supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, MiniMax M2.7 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can MiniMax M2.7 or MiMo V2.6 Pro be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. MiniMax M2.7 is open weight; MiMo V2.6 Pro is open weight.

Can MiniMax M2.7 and MiMo V2.6 Pro understand images?+

MiniMax M2.7 is not documented with image input; MiMo V2.6 Pro is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, MiniMax M2.7 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. MiniMax M2.7 is — and MiMo V2.6 Pro is 131K.

Do MiniMax M2.7 and MiMo V2.6 Pro support reasoning and tool use?+

MiniMax M2.7: tool calling. MiMo V2.6 Pro: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, MiniMax M2.7 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+

MiniMax M2.7 has 5 sourced provider routes; MiMo V2.6 Pro has 2, so MiniMax M2.7 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, MiniMax M2.7 or MiMo V2.6 Pro?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback