MiniMax-M2.7 vs Command A
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2.7 | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,404.90100% of row best · rating · minimax-m2.7; 95% CI [1401.24077059, 1408.56647727]; votes 65411; rank 134 | 1,330.7995% of row best · rating · command-a-03-2025; 95% CI [1327.33626503, 1334.25009199]; votes 55434; rank 208 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 1 benchmark winOverall lead | 0 benchmark wins |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | MiniMax-M2.7 | Command A |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | MiniMax | Cohere |
| Family | Minimax M2 7 | Command A |
| Model | MiniMax-M2.7 | Command A |
| Version | MiniMax-M2.7 | Command A |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | 2024-06-01 |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 204,800 | 256,000 |
| Total parameters | 228,689,764,864 | 111,000,000,000 |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | other | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Cohere (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | agents, chat, citations, multilingual, rag, structured_outputs, tools |
14 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
MiniMax-M2.7 Capabilities
Command A Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
MiniMax-M2.5MiniMax | vs | MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax | family variantstext |
MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax | vs | MiniMax-M3MiniMax | family variantstext |
Command ACohere | vs | Command A VisionCohere | family variantstext |
| vs | Command ACohere | family variantstext | |
 ERNIE 5.1Baidu | vs | Command ACohere | cross-developer peerstext |
ERNIE X1.1Baidu | vs | Command ACohere | cross-developer peerstext |
Command ACohere | vs |  Antigravity AgentGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
| vs | MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax | cross-developer peerstext | |
MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax | vs |  Hy3Tencent | cross-developer peerstext |
MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax | vs |  Mistral-Medium-3.5-128BMistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax | vs | Devstral-2-123B-Instruct-2512Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
MiniMax-M2.7MiniMax | vs | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
MiniMax-M2.7 vs Command A FAQs
Is MiniMax-M2.7 or Command A better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both MiniMax-M2.7 and Command A, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.7 or Command A?+
MiniMax-M2.7 is $0.25 and Command A is $2.50 per million tokens, so MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper on this metric. MiniMax-M2.7 is $1.00 and Command A is $10.00 per million tokens, so MiniMax-M2.7 is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, MiniMax-M2.7 or Command A?+
Command A has the larger sourced context window. MiniMax-M2.7 supports 204,800 and Command A supports 256,000.
Which performs better in benchmarks, MiniMax-M2.7 or Command A?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can MiniMax-M2.7 or Command A be self-hosted?+
MiniMax-M2.7 is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. MiniMax-M2.7 is open weight; Command A is not marked open weight.
Can MiniMax-M2.7 and Command A understand images?+
MiniMax-M2.7 is not documented with image input; Command A is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, MiniMax-M2.7 or Command A?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. MiniMax-M2.7 is — and Command A is 8,000.
Do MiniMax-M2.7 and Command A support reasoning and tool use?+
MiniMax-M2.7: tool calling. Command A: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, MiniMax-M2.7 or Command A?+
MiniMax-M2.7 has 2 sourced provider routes; Command A has 1, so MiniMax-M2.7 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, MiniMax-M2.7 or Command A?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.