Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct vs Mistral Large 3

At a Glance

Compare
Mistral Large 3Mistral AI
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.10Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026$0.25Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.30Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026$0.75Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens10,000K262K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkLlama-4-Scout-17B-16E-InstructMistral Large 3
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,279.2990% of row best · rating · llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct; 95% CI [1274.57681953, 1284.00026285]; votes 29740; rank 2591,427.04100% of row best · rating · mistral-large-3; 95% CI [1424.05319044, 1430.03486299]; votes 69028; rank 91
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,117.8091% of row best · rating · llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct; 95% CI [1108.35603674, 1127.24229078]; votes 6466; rank 1141,222.89100% of row best · rating · mistral-large-3; 95% CI [1213.86519768, 1231.90699514]; votes 6186; rank 70
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified47.3267% of row best · points · Llama 4 Scout · 696 output tokens / case70.39100% of row best · points · Mistral Large 3 · 2,056 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark winsNo overall winner2 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldLlama-4-Scout-17B-16E-InstructMistral Large 3
DeveloperMetaMistral AI
FamilyLlama 4 Scout 17b 16e InstructMistral Large 3
ModelLlama-4-Scout-17B-16E-InstructMistral Large 3
VersionLlama-4-Scout-17B-16E-InstructMistral Large 3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-04-052025-12-02
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Document
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window10,000K262K
Total parameters108.6B675B
Active parameters17B41B
LicenseotherApache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Mistral AI (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolsagents, chat, generation, structured_outputs, tools, vision

Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers4
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct

Mistral Large 3 Capabilities

agentschatgenerationstructured outputstoolsvision
Serving providers2
Canonical IDmistralai/mistral-large-2512

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct vs Mistral Large 3 FAQs

Is Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct or Mistral Large 3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct and Mistral Large 3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+

Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is $0.10 and Mistral Large 3 is $0.25 per million tokens, so Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is cheaper on this metric. Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is $0.30 and Mistral Large 3 is $0.75 per million tokens, so Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+

Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct has the larger sourced context window. Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct supports 10,000K and Mistral Large 3 supports 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct or Mistral Large 3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is open weight; Mistral Large 3 is open weight.

Can Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct and Mistral Large 3 understand images?+

Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is documented with image input; Mistral Large 3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is — and Mistral Large 3 is —.

Do Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct and Mistral Large 3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct: tool calling and image input. Mistral Large 3: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+

Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct has 4 sourced provider routes; Mistral Large 3 has 2, so Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback