Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct vs Mistral Large 3
At a Glance
| Compare | Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.10Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 21, 2026 | $0.25Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.30Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 21, 2026 | $0.75Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 10,000K | 262K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,279.2990% of row best · rating · llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct; 95% CI [1274.57681953, 1284.00026285]; votes 29740; rank 259 | 1,427.04100% of row best · rating · mistral-large-3; 95% CI [1424.05319044, 1430.03486299]; votes 69028; rank 91 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader | 1,117.8091% of row best · rating · llama-4-scout-17b-16e-instruct; 95% CI [1108.35603674, 1127.24229078]; votes 6466; rank 114 | 1,222.89100% of row best · rating · mistral-large-3; 95% CI [1213.86519768, 1231.90699514]; votes 6186; rank 70 |
| ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified | 47.3267% of row best · points · Llama 4 Scout · 696 output tokens / case | 70.39100% of row best · points · Mistral Large 3 · 2,056 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner | 2 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Family | Llama 4 Scout 17b 16e Instruct | Mistral Large 3 |
| Model | Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct | Mistral Large 3 |
| Version | Llama-4-Scout-17B-16E-Instruct | Mistral Large 3 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-04-05 | 2025-12-02 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Document |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 10,000K | 262K |
| Total parameters | 108.6B | 675B |
| Active parameters | 17B | 41B |
| License | other | Apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Mistral AI (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | agents, chat, generation, structured_outputs, tools, vision |
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct Capabilities
Mistral Large 3 Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct vs Mistral Large 3 FAQs
Is Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct or Mistral Large 3 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct and Mistral Large 3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is $0.10 and Mistral Large 3 is $0.25 per million tokens, so Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is cheaper on this metric. Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is $0.30 and Mistral Large 3 is $0.75 per million tokens, so Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct has the larger sourced context window. Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct supports 10,000K and Mistral Large 3 supports 262K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.
Can Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct or Mistral Large 3 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is open weight; Mistral Large 3 is open weight.
Can Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct and Mistral Large 3 understand images?+
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is documented with image input; Mistral Large 3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct is — and Mistral Large 3 is —.
Do Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct and Mistral Large 3 support reasoning and tool use?+
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct: tool calling and image input. Mistral Large 3: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+
Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct has 4 sourced provider routes; Mistral Large 3 has 2, so Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Llama 4 Scout 17B 16E Instruct or Mistral Large 3?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.