Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E vs Mistral Large 3
At a Glance
| Compare |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4 | UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort | #28 of 5743.0 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing LiveBench, ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 14.3–81.0 |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.25Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | Not reported | $0.75Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,000K | 262K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Meta | Mistral AI |
| Family | Llama 4 Maverick 17b 128e | Mistral Large 3 |
| Model | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E | Mistral Large 3 |
| Version | Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E | Mistral Large 3 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-04-05 | 2025-12-02 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Document |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,000K | 262K |
| Total parameters | 401.6B | 675B |
| Active parameters | 17B | 41B |
| License | other | Apache-2.0 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Unknown | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Unknown | Mistral AI (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | agents, chat, generation, structured_outputs, tools, vision |
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Capabilities
Mistral Large 3 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs | cross-developer peersimage, text | ||
 DeepSeek-V4-Flash-BaseDeepSeek | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-BaseDeepSeek | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
 Llama-3.1-8BMeta | vs | family variantstext | |
| vs | family variantsimage, text | ||
| vs | family variantsimage, text | ||
| vs | Ministral-3-3B-Base-2512Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs | Ministral-3-8B-Base-2512Mistral AI | cross-developer peersimage, text | |
| vs | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E vs Mistral Large 3 FAQs
Is Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E or Mistral Large 3 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E and Mistral Large 3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E or Mistral Large 3?+
Only Mistral Large 3 has a directly sourced input price: $0.25 per million tokens. Only Mistral Large 3 has a directly sourced output price: $0.75 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E or Mistral Large 3?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E has the larger sourced context window. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E supports 1,000,000 tokens and Mistral Large 3 supports 262,144 tokens.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E or Mistral Large 3?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E or Mistral Large 3 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E is open weight; Mistral Large 3 is open weight.
Can Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E and Mistral Large 3 understand images?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E is documented with image input; Mistral Large 3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E or Mistral Large 3?+
Neither model has a sourced maximum output in this comparison, so a larger limit cannot be determined.
Do Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E and Mistral Large 3 support reasoning and tool use?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E: tool calling and image input. Mistral Large 3: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E or Mistral Large 3?+
Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E has 0 sourced provider routes; Mistral Large 3 has 2, so Mistral Large 3 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E or Mistral Large 3?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.