Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.050Openrouter · Sep 23, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.080Openrouter · Sep 23, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K131K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldLlama-3.1-8B-InstructPhi-4-multimodal-instruct
DeveloperMetaMicrosoft
FamilyLlama 3 1 8b InstructPhi 4 Multimodal Instruct
ModelLlama-3.1-8B-InstructPhi-4-multimodal-instruct
VersionLlama-3.1-8B-InstructPhi-4-multimodal-instruct
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2024-07-232025-02-26
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K131K
Total parameters8B5.6B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licensellama3.1mit
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessHugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolschat, generation

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct Capabilities

chatgeneration
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmicrosoft/Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct FAQs

Is Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+

Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a directly sourced input price: $0.050 per million tokens. Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a directly sourced output price: $0.080 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is 131K and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct is 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is open weight; Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct is open weight.

Can Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct understand images?+

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is not documented with image input; Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is — and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct is —.

Do Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct support reasoning and tool use?+

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct: tool calling. Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has 2 sourced provider routes; Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct has 0, so Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback