Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Codestral 22B v0.1

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.050Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.080Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K33K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldLlama-3.1-8B-InstructCodestral-22B-v0.1
DeveloperMetaMistral AI
FamilyLlama 3 1 8b InstructCodestral 22b V0 1
ModelLlama-3.1-8B-InstructCodestral-22B-v0.1
VersionLlama-3.1-8B-InstructCodestral-22B-v0.1
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2024-07-23Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K33K
Total parameters8B22.2B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licensellama3.1other
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessHugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolsgeneration

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct

Codestral 22B v0.1 Capabilities

generation
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmistralai/Codestral-22B-v0.1

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct vs Codestral 22B v0.1 FAQs

Is Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Codestral 22B v0.1 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Codestral 22B v0.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Codestral 22B v0.1?+

Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a directly sourced input price: $0.050 per million tokens. Only Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has a directly sourced output price: $0.080 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Codestral 22B v0.1?+

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has the larger sourced context window. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct supports 131K and Codestral 22B v0.1 supports 33K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Codestral 22B v0.1?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Codestral 22B v0.1 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is open weight; Codestral 22B v0.1 is open weight.

Can Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Codestral 22B v0.1 understand images?+

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is not documented with image input; Codestral 22B v0.1 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Codestral 22B v0.1?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is — and Codestral 22B v0.1 is —.

Do Llama 3.1 8B Instruct and Codestral 22B v0.1 support reasoning and tool use?+

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct: tool calling. Codestral 22B v0.1: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Codestral 22B v0.1?+

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has 2 sourced provider routes; Codestral 22B v0.1 has 0, so Llama 3.1 8B Instruct has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct or Codestral 22B v0.1?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback