Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Hy3

At a Glance

Compare
Hy3Tencent
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v4.4UnrankedNot in the 57-model eligible cohort#25 of 5750.1 score · 1/3 sources · single-source provisional · missing LiveBench, ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 16.7–83.4
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.13Deepinfra ↗ · Oct 1, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.528Openrouter ↗ · Oct 19, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K262K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldLlama-3.1-405B-InstructHy3
DeveloperMetaTencent
FamilyLlama 3 1 405b InstructHy3
ModelLlama-3.1-405B-InstructHy3
VersionLlama-3.1-405B-InstructHy3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2024-07-23Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K262K
Total parameters405.9B298.8B
Active parametersUnknown21B
Licensellama3.1apache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessTogether Ai (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolschat, generation, tools

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct

Hy3 Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDtencent/Hy3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct vs Hy3 FAQs

Is Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Hy3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and Hy3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Hy3?+

Only Hy3 has a directly sourced input price: $0.0825 per million tokens. Only Hy3 has a directly sourced output price: $0.33 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Hy3?+

Hy3 has the larger sourced context window. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct supports 131,072 tokens and Hy3 supports 262,144 tokens.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Hy3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Hy3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is open weight; Hy3 is open weight.

Can Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and Hy3 understand images?+

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is not documented with image input; Hy3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Hy3?+

Neither model has a sourced maximum output in this comparison, so a larger limit cannot be determined.

Do Llama 3.1 405B Instruct and Hy3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct: tool calling. Hy3: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Hy3?+

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has 1 sourced provider route; Hy3 has 3, so Hy3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct or Hy3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback