Llama 3.1 405B vs Llama 3.1 405B Instruct

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K131K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldLlama-3.1-405BLlama-3.1-405B-Instruct
DeveloperMetaMeta
FamilyLlama 3 1 405bLlama 3 1 405b Instruct
ModelLlama-3.1-405BLlama-3.1-405B-Instruct
VersionLlama-3.1-405BLlama-3.1-405B-Instruct
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2024-07-232024-07-23
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K131K
Total parameters405.9B405.9B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licensellama3.1llama3.1
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessTogether Ai (Standard)Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitiesgenerationchat, generation, tools

Llama 3.1 405B Capabilities

generation
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-3.1-405B

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Llama 3.1 405B vs Llama 3.1 405B Instruct FAQs

Is Llama 3.1 405B or Llama 3.1 405B Instruct better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Llama 3.1 405B and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.1 405B or Llama 3.1 405B Instruct?+

Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.

Which has a larger context window, Llama 3.1 405B or Llama 3.1 405B Instruct?+

Both models have the same sourced context window: 131,072 tokens each.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Llama 3.1 405B or Llama 3.1 405B Instruct?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Llama 3.1 405B or Llama 3.1 405B Instruct be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same sourced self-hosting status: supported. Llama 3.1 405B is open weight; Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is open weight.

Can Llama 3.1 405B and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct understand images?+

Llama 3.1 405B is not documented with image input; Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Llama 3.1 405B or Llama 3.1 405B Instruct?+

Neither model has a sourced maximum output in this comparison, so a larger limit cannot be determined.

Do Llama 3.1 405B and Llama 3.1 405B Instruct support reasoning and tool use?+

Llama 3.1 405B: none of these features are definitively sourced. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Llama 3.1 405B or Llama 3.1 405B Instruct?+

Llama 3.1 405B has 1 sourced provider route; Llama 3.1 405B Instruct has 1, a tie.

Which offers better value, Llama 3.1 405B or Llama 3.1 405B Instruct?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback