Kimi K2 Thinking vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
At a Glance
| Compare |  Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.60Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $2.50Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 262K | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Kimi-K2-Thinking | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Moonshot AI | NVIDIA |
| Family | Kimi K2 Thinking | Nvidia Nemotron 3 5 Lightning |
| Model | Kimi-K2-Thinking | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B |
| Version | Kimi-K2-Thinking | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2025-11-06 | 2026-08-11 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 262K | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | 1T | 30B |
| Active parameters | 32B | 3B |
| License | other | openmdw-1.1 |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Fireworks Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | agents, chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
Kimi K2 Thinking Capabilities
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Kimi-K2-ThinkingMoonshot AI | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Kimi-K2-ThinkingMoonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Kimi-K2-ThinkingMoonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Kimi-K2-ThinkingMoonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Kimi-K2-ThinkingMoonshot AI | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Kimi-K2-ThinkingMoonshot AI | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Kimi-K2-ThinkingMoonshot AI | vs | Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | family variantstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Kimi-K2-ThinkingMoonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Kimi-K2-ThinkingMoonshot AI | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Kimi-K2-ThinkingMoonshot AI | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Kimi-K2-ThinkingMoonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | Kimi-K2-ThinkingMoonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Kimi K2 Thinking vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B FAQs
Is Kimi K2 Thinking or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Kimi K2 Thinking and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 Thinking or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+
Only Kimi K2 Thinking has a directly sourced input price: $0.60 per million tokens. Only Kimi K2 Thinking has a directly sourced output price: $2.50 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Kimi K2 Thinking or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has the larger sourced context window. Kimi K2 Thinking supports 262K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B supports 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Kimi K2 Thinking or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Kimi K2 Thinking or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Kimi K2 Thinking is open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is open weight.
Can Kimi K2 Thinking and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B understand images?+
Kimi K2 Thinking is not documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Kimi K2 Thinking or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Kimi K2 Thinking is 131K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is —.
Do Kimi K2 Thinking and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B support reasoning and tool use?+
Kimi K2 Thinking: reasoning and tool calling. NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Kimi K2 Thinking or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+
Kimi K2 Thinking has 2 sourced provider routes; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has 1, so Kimi K2 Thinking has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Kimi K2 Thinking or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.