Kimi K2 Thinking vs Hy3

At a Glance

Compare
Kimi K2 ThinkingMoonshot AI
Hy3Tencent
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.60Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026$0.13Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$2.50Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026$0.528Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K262K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldKimi-K2-ThinkingHy3
DeveloperMoonshot AITencent
FamilyKimi K2 ThinkingHy3
ModelKimi-K2-ThinkingHy3
VersionKimi-K2-ThinkingHy3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-11-06Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K262K
Total parameters1T298.8B
Active parameters32B21B
Licenseotherapache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessHugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, tools

Kimi K2 Thinking Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K2-Thinking

Hy3 Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDtencent/Hy3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Kimi K2 Thinking vs Hy3 FAQs

Is Kimi K2 Thinking or Hy3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Kimi K2 Thinking and Hy3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 Thinking or Hy3?+

Kimi K2 Thinking is $0.60 and Hy3 is $0.13 per million tokens, so Hy3 is cheaper on this metric. Kimi K2 Thinking is $2.50 and Hy3 is $0.528 per million tokens, so Hy3 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K2 Thinking or Hy3?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Kimi K2 Thinking is 262K and Hy3 is 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Kimi K2 Thinking or Hy3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Kimi K2 Thinking or Hy3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Kimi K2 Thinking is open weight; Hy3 is open weight.

Can Kimi K2 Thinking and Hy3 understand images?+

Kimi K2 Thinking is not documented with image input; Hy3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Kimi K2 Thinking or Hy3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Kimi K2 Thinking is 131K and Hy3 is —.

Do Kimi K2 Thinking and Hy3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Kimi K2 Thinking: reasoning and tool calling. Hy3: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Kimi K2 Thinking or Hy3?+

Kimi K2 Thinking has 2 sourced provider routes; Hy3 has 3, so Hy3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Kimi K2 Thinking or Hy3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback