Kimi K2.7 Code vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16

At a Glance

Compare
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#9 of 44$0.042 per LiveBench case#19 of 44$0.092 per LiveBench case
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.68Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026$0.50Openrouter · Aug 29, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$3.21Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026$2.20Openrouter · Aug 29, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K262K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader71.4597% of row best · percent · kimi-k2.7-code · 13,007 output tokens / case73.49100% of row best · percent · nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b · 41,654 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark winsNo overall winner1 benchmark winNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldKimi K2.7 CodeNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16
DeveloperMoonshot AINVIDIA
FamilyKimi K2 7Nvidia Nemotron 3 Ultra 550b A55b Bf16
ModelKimi K2.7 CodeNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16
VersionKimi K2.7 CodeNVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-06-112026-06-04
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K262K
Total parameters1T560.5B
Active parameters32B55B
Licensemodified-mitother
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, coding, reasoning, tools, visionchat, generation, reasoning, tools

Kimi K2.7 Code Capabilities

agentschatcodingreasoningtoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K2.7-Code

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDnvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Kimi K2.7 Code vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 FAQs

Is Kimi K2.7 Code or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Kimi K2.7 Code and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16?+

Kimi K2.7 Code is $0.68 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is $0.50 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is cheaper on this metric. Kimi K2.7 Code is $3.21 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is $2.20 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K2.7 Code or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Kimi K2.7 Code is 262K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Kimi K2.7 Code or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Kimi K2.7 Code or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Kimi K2.7 Code is open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is open weight.

Can Kimi K2.7 Code and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 understand images?+

Kimi K2.7 Code is documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Kimi K2.7 Code or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Kimi K2.7 Code is — and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is —.

Do Kimi K2.7 Code and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 support reasoning and tool use?+

Kimi K2.7 Code: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Kimi K2.7 Code or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16?+

Kimi K2.7 Code has 4 sourced provider routes; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 has 3, so Kimi K2.7 Code has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Kimi K2.7 Code or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback