Kimi K2.7 Code vs Hunyuan3D 2.1
At a Glance
| Compare |  Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI |  Hunyuan3D 2.1Tencent |
|---|---|---|
| Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency | ||
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | #9 of 44$0.042 per LiveBench case | UnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort |
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.68Deepinfra ↗ · Sep 21, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $3.21Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 262K | Not reported |
| Model facts checked | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 28, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Kimi K2.7 Code | Hunyuan3D-2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Moonshot AI | Tencent |
| Family | Kimi K2 7 | Hunyuan3d 2 1 |
| Model | Kimi K2.7 Code | Hunyuan3D-2.1 |
| Version | Kimi K2.7 Code | Hunyuan3D-2.1 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-06-11 | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video | Image |
| Output modalities | Text | 3D |
| Context window | 262K | Unknown |
| Total parameters | 1T | Unknown |
| Active parameters | 32B | Unknown |
| License | modified-mit | other |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| API available | Yes | Unknown |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | agents, chat, coding, reasoning, tools, vision | generation |
Kimi K2.7 Code Capabilities
Hunyuan3D 2.1 Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All video comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI | vs | Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | family variantsimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI | vs | Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text, video |
 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Hunyuan3D 2.1 FAQs
Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Hunyuan3D 2.1 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Kimi K2.7 Code and Hunyuan3D 2.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+
Only Kimi K2.7 Code has a directly sourced input price: $0.68 per million tokens. Only Kimi K2.7 Code has a directly sourced output price: $3.21 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Kimi K2.7 Code or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Kimi K2.7 Code is 262K and Hunyuan3D 2.1 is —.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Kimi K2.7 Code or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Kimi K2.7 Code or Hunyuan3D 2.1 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Kimi K2.7 Code is open weight; Hunyuan3D 2.1 is open weight.
Can Kimi K2.7 Code and Hunyuan3D 2.1 understand images?+
Kimi K2.7 Code is documented with image input; Hunyuan3D 2.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Kimi K2.7 Code or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Kimi K2.7 Code is — and Hunyuan3D 2.1 is —.
Do Kimi K2.7 Code and Hunyuan3D 2.1 support reasoning and tool use?+
Kimi K2.7 Code: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Hunyuan3D 2.1: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Kimi K2.7 Code or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+
Kimi K2.7 Code has 4 sourced provider routes; Hunyuan3D 2.1 has 0, so Kimi K2.7 Code has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Kimi K2.7 Code or Hunyuan3D 2.1?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.