Kimi K2.7 Code vs Grok Build 0.1

At a Glance

Compare
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#9 of 44$0.042 per LiveBench case#1 of 44$0.0020 per LiveBench case
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.68Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026$1.00Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$3.21Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026$2.00Xai · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K256K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeGrok Build 0.1
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader71.45100% of row best · percent · kimi-k2.7-code · 13,007 output tokens / case71.09100% of row best · percent · grok-build-0.1 · 980 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldKimi K2.7 CodeGrok Build 0.1
DeveloperMoonshot AIxAI
FamilyKimi K2 7Grok Build
ModelKimi K2.7 CodeGrok Build 0.1
VersionKimi K2.7 CodeGrok Build 0.1
Lifecycleactivepreview
Released2026-06-112026-05-29
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K256K
Total parameters1TUnknown
Active parameters32BUnknown
Licensemodified-mitUnknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitiesagents, chat, coding, reasoning, tools, visionchat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Kimi K2.7 Code Capabilities

agentschatcodingreasoningtoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K2.7-Code

Grok Build 0.1 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-build-0.1

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Grok Build 0.1 FAQs

Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Kimi K2.7 Code and Grok Build 0.1, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Grok Build 0.1?+

Kimi K2.7 Code is $0.68 and Grok Build 0.1 is $1.00 per million tokens, so Kimi K2.7 Code is cheaper on this metric. Kimi K2.7 Code is $3.21 and Grok Build 0.1 is $2.00 per million tokens, so Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K2.7 Code or Grok Build 0.1?+

Kimi K2.7 Code has the larger sourced context window. Kimi K2.7 Code supports 262K and Grok Build 0.1 supports 256K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Kimi K2.7 Code or Grok Build 0.1?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Kimi K2.7 Code or Grok Build 0.1 be self-hosted?+

Kimi K2.7 Code is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Kimi K2.7 Code is open weight; Grok Build 0.1 is not marked open weight.

Can Kimi K2.7 Code and Grok Build 0.1 understand images?+

Kimi K2.7 Code is documented with image input; Grok Build 0.1 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Kimi K2.7 Code or Grok Build 0.1?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Kimi K2.7 Code is — and Grok Build 0.1 is —.

Do Kimi K2.7 Code and Grok Build 0.1 support reasoning and tool use?+

Kimi K2.7 Code: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Grok Build 0.1: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Kimi K2.7 Code or Grok Build 0.1?+

Kimi K2.7 Code has 4 sourced provider routes; Grok Build 0.1 has 1, so Kimi K2.7 Code has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Kimi K2.7 Code or Grok Build 0.1?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback