Model Markets
Get Free API KeyAPI

Kimi K2.7 Code vs GR00T N1.7 3B

At a Glance

Compare
Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#9 of 44$0.042 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262KNot reported
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →
Different Model RolesThese models do not share a sourced market category. Their primary-source facts remain comparable below, while performance claims require matched evidence.

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldKimi K2.7 CodeGR00T N1.7 3B
DeveloperMoonshot AINVIDIA
FamilyKimi K2 7Isaac GR00T
ModelKimi K2.7 CodeGR00T N1.7 3B
VersionKimi K2.7 CodeN1.7
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-06-112026-07-07
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, VideoText, Image, Robot state
Output modalitiesTextRobot action
Context window262KUnknown
Total parameters1T3B
Active parameters32BUnknown
Licensemodified-mitapache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesNo
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitiesagents, chat, coding, reasoning, tools, visioncross-embodiment, dexterous-manipulation, whole-body-control, fine-tuning
Robotics model typeUnknownVision-language-action model
Action representationUnknownPredictive chunks of relative joint motions
Control architectureUnknownVision-language backbone with action expert
Inference locationUnknownOn device
Native control rate (Hz)UnknownUnknown
Supported embodimentsUnknownUnitree G1, AgiBot Genie-1, Fourier GR-1, bimanual manipulation platforms
Training dataUnknownMixture of real teleoperation, synthetic robot data, and internet-scale video described by NVIDIA.

Kimi K2.7 Code Capabilities

agentschatcodingreasoningtoolsvision
Model typeUnknown
InferenceUnknown
Action representationUnknown
Supported embodimentsUnknown
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K2.7-Code

GR00T N1.7 3B Capabilities

cross-embodimentdexterous-manipulationwhole-body-controlfine-tuning
Model typeVision-language-action model
InferenceOn device
Action representationPredictive chunks of relative joint motions
Supported embodiments4
Canonical IDnvidia/GR00T-N1.7-3B

Related Comparisons

APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

moonshotai/Kimi-K2.7-Code developer model repositoryMoonshot AI · observed Sep 3, 2026NVIDIA Isaac GR00T N1.7 official repositoryNVIDIA · observed Aug 29, 2026

Questions

Kimi K2.7 Code vs GR00T N1.7 3B FAQs

Is Kimi K2.7 Code or GR00T N1.7 3B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Kimi K2.7 Code and GR00T N1.7 3B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or GR00T N1.7 3B?+

Only Kimi K2.7 Code has a directly sourced input price: $0.68 per million tokens. Only Kimi K2.7 Code has a directly sourced output price: $3.21 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K2.7 Code or GR00T N1.7 3B?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Kimi K2.7 Code is 262K and GR00T N1.7 3B is —.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Kimi K2.7 Code or GR00T N1.7 3B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Kimi K2.7 Code or GR00T N1.7 3B be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Kimi K2.7 Code is open weight; GR00T N1.7 3B is open weight.

Can Kimi K2.7 Code and GR00T N1.7 3B understand images?+

Kimi K2.7 Code is documented with image input; GR00T N1.7 3B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Kimi K2.7 Code or GR00T N1.7 3B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Kimi K2.7 Code is — and GR00T N1.7 3B is —.

Do Kimi K2.7 Code and GR00T N1.7 3B support reasoning and tool use?+

Kimi K2.7 Code: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GR00T N1.7 3B: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Kimi K2.7 Code or GR00T N1.7 3B?+

Kimi K2.7 Code has 4 sourced provider routes; GR00T N1.7 3B has 0, so Kimi K2.7 Code has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Kimi K2.7 Code or GR00T N1.7 3B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback