Kimi K2.6 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16

At a Glance

Compare
Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#32 of 4650.5 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 33.6–67.0UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#21 of 44$0.095 per LiveBench case#19 of 44$0.092 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#24 of 3850.1 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 41.7–58.4UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.75Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026$0.50Openrouter · Aug 29, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$3.50Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026$2.20Openrouter · Aug 29, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K262K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkKimi-K2.6NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader74.18100% of row best · percent · kimi-k2.6-thinking · 27,001 output tokens / case73.4999% of row best · percent · nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b · 41,654 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified82.24100% of row best · points · Kimi K2.6 (thinking) · 18,080 output tokens / case76.3393% of row best · points · Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B (reasoning) · 2,940 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldKimi-K2.6NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16
DeveloperMoonshot AINVIDIA
FamilyKimi K2 6Nvidia Nemotron 3 Ultra 550b A55b Bf16
ModelKimi-K2.6NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16
VersionKimi-K2.6NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-04-202026-06-04
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K262K
Total parameters1T560.5B
Active parameters32B55B
Licenseotherother
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

Kimi K2.6 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers5
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K2.6

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDnvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B-BF16

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Kimi K2.6 vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 FAQs

Is Kimi K2.6 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Kimi K2.6 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16?+

Kimi K2.6 is $0.75 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is $0.50 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is cheaper on this metric. Kimi K2.6 is $3.50 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is $2.20 per million tokens, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K2.6 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Kimi K2.6 is 262K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Kimi K2.6 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Kimi K2.6 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Kimi K2.6 is open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is open weight.

Can Kimi K2.6 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 understand images?+

Kimi K2.6 is documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Kimi K2.6 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Kimi K2.6 is — and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 is —.

Do Kimi K2.6 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 support reasoning and tool use?+

Kimi K2.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Kimi K2.6 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16?+

Kimi K2.6 has 5 sourced provider routes; NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16 has 3, so Kimi K2.6 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Kimi K2.6 or NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B A55B BF16?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback