Kimi K2.6 vs Inkling

At a Glance

Compare
Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI
InklingThinking Machines Lab
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#32 of 4650.5 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 33.6–67.0#34 of 4645.4 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#21 of 44$0.095 per LiveBench case#18 of 44$0.090 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#24 of 3850.1 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 41.7–58.4#28 of 3848.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.75Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026$0.95Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$3.50Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026$4.05Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkKimi-K2.6Inkling
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,454.92100% of row best · rating · kimi-k2.6; 95% CI [1450.40277919, 1459.43693683]; votes 37502; rank 381,439.6899% of row best · rating · inkling; 95% CI [1434.76600975, 1444.58550789]; votes 25922; rank 67
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader74.1897% of row best · percent · kimi-k2.6-thinking · 27,001 output tokens / case76.47100% of row best · percent · inkling-xhigh · 22,213 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified82.24100% of row best · points · Kimi K2.6 (thinking) · 18,080 output tokens / case79.4197% of row best · points · Inkling · 5,785 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winNo overall winner1 benchmark winNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldKimi-K2.6Inkling
DeveloperMoonshot AIThinking Machines Lab
FamilyKimi K2 6Inkling
ModelKimi-K2.6Inkling
VersionKimi-K2.6Inkling
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-04-202026-07-15
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K1,049K
Total parameters1T975B
Active parameters32B41B
Licenseotherapache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolsagents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, tools, vision

Kimi K2.6 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers5
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K2.6

Inkling Capabilities

agentschatcodinggenerationreasoningtoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDthinkingmachines/Inkling

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Kimi K2.6 vs Inkling FAQs

Is Kimi K2.6 or Inkling better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Kimi K2.6 and Inkling, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.6 or Inkling?+

Kimi K2.6 is $0.75 and Inkling is $0.95 per million tokens, so Kimi K2.6 is cheaper on this metric. Kimi K2.6 is $3.50 and Inkling is $4.05 per million tokens, so Kimi K2.6 is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K2.6 or Inkling?+

Inkling has the larger sourced context window. Kimi K2.6 supports 262K and Inkling supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Kimi K2.6 or Inkling?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: The verified common benchmarks do not produce a majority winner.

Can Kimi K2.6 or Inkling be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Kimi K2.6 is open weight; Inkling is open weight.

Can Kimi K2.6 and Inkling understand images?+

Kimi K2.6 is documented with image input; Inkling is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Kimi K2.6 or Inkling?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Kimi K2.6 is — and Inkling is —.

Do Kimi K2.6 and Inkling support reasoning and tool use?+

Kimi K2.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Inkling: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Kimi K2.6 or Inkling?+

Kimi K2.6 has 5 sourced provider routes; Inkling has 4, so Kimi K2.6 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Kimi K2.6 or Inkling?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback