Hunyuan3D 2.1 vs Hy3

At a Glance

Compare
Hy3Tencent
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.13Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.528Openrouter · Sep 23, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokensNot reported262K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Different Model RolesThese models do not share a sourced market category. Their primary-source facts remain comparable below, while performance claims require matched evidence.

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldHunyuan3D-2.1Hy3
DeveloperTencentTencent
FamilyHunyuan3d 2 1Hy3
ModelHunyuan3D-2.1Hy3
VersionHunyuan3D-2.1Hy3
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknownUnknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesImageText
Output modalities3DText
Context windowUnknown262K
Total parametersUnknown298.8B
Active parametersUnknown21B
Licenseotherapache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessUnknownDeepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitiesgenerationchat, generation, tools

Hunyuan3D 2.1 Capabilities

generation
Serving providers0
Canonical IDtencent/Hunyuan3D-2.1

Hy3 Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDtencent/Hy3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Hunyuan3D 2.1 vs Hy3 FAQs

Is Hunyuan3D 2.1 or Hy3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Hunyuan3D 2.1 and Hy3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Hunyuan3D 2.1 or Hy3?+

Only Hy3 has a directly sourced input price: $0.13 per million tokens. Only Hy3 has a directly sourced output price: $0.528 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Hunyuan3D 2.1 or Hy3?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Hunyuan3D 2.1 is — and Hy3 is 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Hunyuan3D 2.1 or Hy3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Hunyuan3D 2.1 or Hy3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Hunyuan3D 2.1 is open weight; Hy3 is open weight.

Can Hunyuan3D 2.1 and Hy3 understand images?+

Hunyuan3D 2.1 is documented with image input; Hy3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Hunyuan3D 2.1 or Hy3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Hunyuan3D 2.1 is — and Hy3 is —.

Do Hunyuan3D 2.1 and Hy3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Hunyuan3D 2.1: image input. Hy3: tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Hunyuan3D 2.1 or Hy3?+

Hunyuan3D 2.1 has 0 sourced provider routes; Hy3 has 3, so Hy3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Hunyuan3D 2.1 or Hy3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback