Granite Vision 4.1 4B vs o3

At a Glance

Compare
o3OpenAI
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$1.00Openrouter · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$4.00Openrouter · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K200K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

Fieldgranite-vision-4.1-4bo3
DeveloperIBMOpenAI
FamilyGranite Vision 4 1 4bO3
Modelgranite-vision-4.1-4bo3
Versiongranite-vision-4.1-4bo3
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-04-292025-04-16
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2024-06-01
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K200K
Total parameters4BUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessUnknownOpenai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Granite Vision 4.1 4B Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-vision-4.1-4b

o3 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/o3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Granite Vision 4.1 4B vs o3 FAQs

Is Granite Vision 4.1 4B or o3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Granite Vision 4.1 4B and o3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Granite Vision 4.1 4B or o3?+

Only o3 has a directly sourced input price: $1.00 per million tokens. Only o3 has a directly sourced output price: $4.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Granite Vision 4.1 4B or o3?+

o3 has the larger sourced context window. Granite Vision 4.1 4B supports 131K and o3 supports 200K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Granite Vision 4.1 4B or o3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Granite Vision 4.1 4B or o3 be self-hosted?+

Granite Vision 4.1 4B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Granite Vision 4.1 4B is open weight; o3 is not marked open weight.

Can Granite Vision 4.1 4B and o3 understand images?+

Granite Vision 4.1 4B is documented with image input; o3 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Granite Vision 4.1 4B or o3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Granite Vision 4.1 4B is — and o3 is 100K.

Do Granite Vision 4.1 4B and o3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Granite Vision 4.1 4B: tool calling and image input. o3: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Granite Vision 4.1 4B or o3?+

Granite Vision 4.1 4B has 0 sourced provider routes; o3 has 2, so o3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Granite Vision 4.1 4B or o3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback