Granite Vision 4.1 4B vs Llama 3.1 405B

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K131K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

Fieldgranite-vision-4.1-4bLlama-3.1-405B
DeveloperIBMMeta
FamilyGranite Vision 4 1 4bLlama 3 1 405b
Modelgranite-vision-4.1-4bLlama-3.1-405B
Versiongranite-vision-4.1-4bLlama-3.1-405B
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-04-292024-07-23
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K131K
Total parameters4B405.9B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0llama3.1
Open weightsYesYes
API availableUnknownYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessUnknownTogether Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolsgeneration

Granite Vision 4.1 4B Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-vision-4.1-4b

Llama 3.1 405B Capabilities

generation
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-3.1-405B

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Granite Vision 4.1 4B vs Llama 3.1 405B FAQs

Is Granite Vision 4.1 4B or Llama 3.1 405B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Granite Vision 4.1 4B and Llama 3.1 405B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Granite Vision 4.1 4B or Llama 3.1 405B?+

Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.

Which has a larger context window, Granite Vision 4.1 4B or Llama 3.1 405B?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Granite Vision 4.1 4B is 131K and Llama 3.1 405B is 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Granite Vision 4.1 4B or Llama 3.1 405B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Granite Vision 4.1 4B or Llama 3.1 405B be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Granite Vision 4.1 4B is open weight; Llama 3.1 405B is open weight.

Can Granite Vision 4.1 4B and Llama 3.1 405B understand images?+

Granite Vision 4.1 4B is documented with image input; Llama 3.1 405B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Granite Vision 4.1 4B or Llama 3.1 405B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Granite Vision 4.1 4B is — and Llama 3.1 405B is —.

Do Granite Vision 4.1 4B and Llama 3.1 405B support reasoning and tool use?+

Granite Vision 4.1 4B: tool calling and image input. Llama 3.1 405B: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Granite Vision 4.1 4B or Llama 3.1 405B?+

Granite Vision 4.1 4B has 0 sourced provider routes; Llama 3.1 405B has 1, so Llama 3.1 405B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Granite Vision 4.1 4B or Llama 3.1 405B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback