Granite Embedding 30m English vs Inkling

At a Glance

Compare
InklingThinking Machines Lab
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#34 of 4645.4 score · 3/3 sources · complete
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#18 of 44$0.090 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#28 of 3848.1 score · 3/3 sources · complete
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.95Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$4.05Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Different Model RolesThese models do not share a sourced market category. Their primary-source facts remain comparable below, while performance claims require matched evidence.

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

Fieldgranite-embedding-30m-englishInkling
DeveloperIBMThinking Machines Lab
FamilyGranite Embedding 30m EnglishInkling
Modelgranite-embedding-30m-englishInkling
Versiongranite-embedding-30m-englishInkling
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2025-08-292026-07-15
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText, Image, Video, Audio
Output modalitiesEmbeddingText
Context window1K1,049K
Total parameters30.3M975B
Active parametersUnknown41B
Licenseapache-2.0apache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessHugging Face (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)
Capabilitiesembeddingsagents, chat, coding, generation, reasoning, tools, vision

Granite Embedding 30m English Capabilities

embeddings
Serving providers1
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-embedding-30m-english

Inkling Capabilities

agentschatcodinggenerationreasoningtoolsvision
Serving providers4
Canonical IDthinkingmachines/Inkling

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Granite Embedding 30m English vs Inkling FAQs

Is Granite Embedding 30m English or Inkling better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Granite Embedding 30m English and Inkling, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Granite Embedding 30m English or Inkling?+

Only Inkling has a directly sourced input price: $0.95 per million tokens. Only Inkling has a directly sourced output price: $4.05 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Granite Embedding 30m English or Inkling?+

Inkling has the larger sourced context window. Granite Embedding 30m English supports 1K and Inkling supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Granite Embedding 30m English or Inkling?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Granite Embedding 30m English or Inkling be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Granite Embedding 30m English is open weight; Inkling is open weight.

Can Granite Embedding 30m English and Inkling understand images?+

Granite Embedding 30m English is not documented with image input; Inkling is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Granite Embedding 30m English or Inkling?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Granite Embedding 30m English is — and Inkling is —.

Do Granite Embedding 30m English and Inkling support reasoning and tool use?+

Granite Embedding 30m English: none of these features are definitively sourced. Inkling: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Granite Embedding 30m English or Inkling?+

Granite Embedding 30m English has 1 sourced provider route; Inkling has 4, so Inkling has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Granite Embedding 30m English or Inkling?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback