Granite 4.2 8B vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct

At a Glance

Compare
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.060Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.25Deepinfra · Sep 23, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K131K
Model facts checkedSep 2, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGranite 4.2 8BPhi-4-mini-instruct
DeveloperIBMMicrosoft
FamilyGranite 4 2Phi 4 Mini Instruct
ModelGranite 4.2 8BPhi-4-mini-instruct
VersionGranite 4.2 8BPhi-4-mini-instruct
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-08-252025-02-26
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K131K
Total parameters8.8B3.8B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0mit
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Hugging Face (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation

Granite 4.2 8B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDibm-granite/granite-4.2-8b

Phi-4 Mini Instruct Capabilities

chatgeneration
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmicrosoft/Phi-4-mini-instruct

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Granite 4.2 8B vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct FAQs

Is Granite 4.2 8B or Phi-4 Mini Instruct better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Granite 4.2 8B and Phi-4 Mini Instruct, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Phi-4 Mini Instruct?+

Only Granite 4.2 8B has a directly sourced input price: $0.060 per million tokens. Only Granite 4.2 8B has a directly sourced output price: $0.25 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Granite 4.2 8B or Phi-4 Mini Instruct?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Granite 4.2 8B is 131K and Phi-4 Mini Instruct is 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Granite 4.2 8B or Phi-4 Mini Instruct?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Granite 4.2 8B or Phi-4 Mini Instruct be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Granite 4.2 8B is open weight; Phi-4 Mini Instruct is open weight.

Can Granite 4.2 8B and Phi-4 Mini Instruct understand images?+

Granite 4.2 8B is not documented with image input; Phi-4 Mini Instruct is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Granite 4.2 8B or Phi-4 Mini Instruct?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Granite 4.2 8B is — and Phi-4 Mini Instruct is —.

Do Granite 4.2 8B and Phi-4 Mini Instruct support reasoning and tool use?+

Granite 4.2 8B: reasoning and tool calling. Phi-4 Mini Instruct: none of these features are definitively sourced. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Granite 4.2 8B or Phi-4 Mini Instruct?+

Granite 4.2 8B has 2 sourced provider routes; Phi-4 Mini Instruct has 1, so Granite 4.2 8B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Granite 4.2 8B or Phi-4 Mini Instruct?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback