Granite 4.2 30B vs Muse Spark 1.2
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,362.5592% of row best · rating · granite-4.2-30b; 95% CI [1351.93384890, 1373.17607017]; votes 3287; rank 177 | 1,488.47100% of row best · rating · muse-spark-1.2 (xHigh); 95% CI [1478.00612479, 1498.93408698]; votes 3244; rank 8 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 1 benchmark winOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Granite 4.2 30B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | IBM | Meta |
| Family | Granite 4 2 | Muse Spark |
| Model | Granite 4.2 30B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
| Version | Granite 4.2 30B | Muse Spark 1.2 |
| Lifecycle | active | preview |
| Released | 2026-08-25 | 2026-08-05 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Video, Audio |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 131K | Unknown |
| Total parameters | 29.3B | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | apache-2.0 | Unknown |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
| Provider access | Deepinfra (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools | chat, computer-use, generation, reasoning, research, structured_outputs, tools |
12 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
Granite 4.2 30B Capabilities
Muse Spark 1.2 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext | |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
 DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext | |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext | |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | cross-developer peerstext | |
| vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Granite 4.2 30B vs Muse Spark 1.2 FAQs
Is Granite 4.2 30B or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Granite 4.2 30B and Muse Spark 1.2, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 30B or Muse Spark 1.2?+
Only Granite 4.2 30B has a directly sourced input price: $0.16 per million tokens. Only Granite 4.2 30B has a directly sourced output price: $0.65 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Granite 4.2 30B or Muse Spark 1.2?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Granite 4.2 30B is 131K and Muse Spark 1.2 is —.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Granite 4.2 30B or Muse Spark 1.2?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Granite 4.2 30B or Muse Spark 1.2 be self-hosted?+
Granite 4.2 30B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Granite 4.2 30B is open weight; Muse Spark 1.2 is not marked open weight.
Can Granite 4.2 30B and Muse Spark 1.2 understand images?+
Granite 4.2 30B is not documented with image input; Muse Spark 1.2 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Granite 4.2 30B or Muse Spark 1.2?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Granite 4.2 30B is — and Muse Spark 1.2 is —.
Do Granite 4.2 30B and Muse Spark 1.2 support reasoning and tool use?+
Granite 4.2 30B: reasoning and tool calling. Muse Spark 1.2: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Granite 4.2 30B or Muse Spark 1.2?+
Granite 4.2 30B has 1 sourced provider route; Muse Spark 1.2 has 0, so Granite 4.2 30B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Granite 4.2 30B or Muse Spark 1.2?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.