gpt-oss-120b vs GLM 5.3

At a Glance

Compare
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#16 of 4670.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 46.9–80.3
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#34 of 44$0.248 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#26 of 3850.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 38.2–54.9
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.037Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026$1.20Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.17Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026$4.00Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens131K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 28, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bGLM-5.3
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,365.8793% of row best · rating · gpt-oss-120b; 95% CI [1361.49487468, 1370.23719284]; votes 29955; rank 1761,475.08100% of row best · rating · glm-5.3-max; 95% CI [1468.67816284, 1481.48915679]; votes 10960; rank 20
ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified68.0177% of row best · points · gpt-oss 120B (high) · 7,577 output tokens / case88.34100% of row best · points · GLM-5.3 · 22,204 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark winsNo overall winner1 benchmark winNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

Fieldgpt-oss-120bGLM-5.3
DeveloperOpenAIZ.ai
FamilyGpt Oss 120bGlm 5 3
Modelgpt-oss-120bGLM-5.3
Versiongpt-oss-120bGLM-5.3
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknownUnknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesTextText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window131K1,000K
Total parameters116.8BUnknown
Active parameters5.1BUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0Unknown
Open weightsYesNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesNo
Provider accessCerebras (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Serverless, Standard), Groq (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Serverless, Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard), Z.ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolsagents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

gpt-oss-120b Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers7
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-oss-120b

GLM 5.3 Capabilities

agentschatreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers4
Canonical IDzai-org/glm-5.3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

gpt-oss-120b vs GLM 5.3 FAQs

Is gpt-oss-120b or GLM 5.3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both gpt-oss-120b and GLM 5.3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, gpt-oss-120b or GLM 5.3?+

gpt-oss-120b is $0.037 and GLM 5.3 is $1.20 per million tokens, so gpt-oss-120b is cheaper on this metric. gpt-oss-120b is $0.17 and GLM 5.3 is $4.00 per million tokens, so gpt-oss-120b is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, gpt-oss-120b or GLM 5.3?+

GLM 5.3 has the larger sourced context window. gpt-oss-120b supports 131K and GLM 5.3 supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, gpt-oss-120b or GLM 5.3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can gpt-oss-120b or GLM 5.3 be self-hosted?+

gpt-oss-120b is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. gpt-oss-120b is open weight; GLM 5.3 is not marked open weight.

Can gpt-oss-120b and GLM 5.3 understand images?+

gpt-oss-120b is not documented with image input; GLM 5.3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, gpt-oss-120b or GLM 5.3?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. gpt-oss-120b is — and GLM 5.3 is 131K.

Do gpt-oss-120b and GLM 5.3 support reasoning and tool use?+

gpt-oss-120b: reasoning and tool calling. GLM 5.3: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, gpt-oss-120b or GLM 5.3?+

gpt-oss-120b has 7 sourced provider routes; GLM 5.3 has 4, so gpt-oss-120b has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, gpt-oss-120b or GLM 5.3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback