GPT-5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingGPT-5.5Qwen3.8-Max
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2#5 of 2284.2 scoreUnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#32 of 36$0.341 per LiveBench case#19 of 36$0.107 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0#10 of 2252.7 scoreUnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkGPT-5.5Qwen3.8-Max
LMArena Agent Arenaagent-2026-08-31-011508720696 · outcome_score · statistical tie4.8499% of row best · score · GPT 5.5; 95% CI [3.96340788, 5.71819765]; sessions 77762; observations 1908513; rank 186.01100% of row best · score · Qwen3.8 Max; 95% CI [4.88117795, 7.13339178]; sessions 18386; observations 1372080; rank 14
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,466.8099% of row best · rating · gpt-5.5; 95% CI [1462.99653821, 1470.60035247]; votes 64686; rank 271,479.56100% of row best · rating · qwen3.8-max; 95% CI [1473.34740586, 1485.77213629]; votes 13136; rank 12
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-08-27-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,294.3699% of row best · rating · gpt-5.5-high; 95% CI [1287.65516407, 1301.05910249]; votes 20121; rank 181,312.86100% of row best · rating · qwen3.8-max; 95% CI [1304.57707433, 1321.13715544]; votes 7244; rank 6
LiveBench2026-06-25 · overall · leader84.54100% of row best · percent · gpt-5.5-xhigh · 11,355 output tokens / case81.8897% of row best · percent · qwen3.8-max · 21,637 output tokens / case
ToneBench2026-08-28-10-task-cd9819ab6e4d · overall_score · leader81.53100% of row best · points · GPT-5.5 (none) · 3,805 output tokens / case81.0699% of row best · points · Qwen3.8 Max · 23,334 output tokens / case
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie2 benchmark winsTied overall2 benchmark winsTied overall

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
OpenAI · activeGPT-5.5Verified Sep 3, 2026
Qwen · activeQwen3.8 MaxVerified Aug 29, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldGPT-5.5Qwen3.8-Max
DeveloperOpenAIQwen
FamilyGpt 5 5Qwen3 8 Max
ModelGPT-5.5Qwen3.8-Max
VersionGPT-5.5Qwen3.8-Max
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-04-23Unknown
Knowledge cutoff2025-12-01Unknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image, Video
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,050K1,000K
Total parametersUnknown2.4T
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessOpenai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Alibaba Cloud Model Studio (Standard), Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolsagents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools, vision

13 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

GPT-5.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price$5.00
Output price$30.00
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-5.5

Qwen3.8 Max Capabilities

agentschatreasoningstructured outputstoolsvision
Input price$1.65
Output price$4.951
Serving providers4
Canonical IDqwen/qwen3.8-max

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

GPT-5.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max FAQs

Is GPT-5.5 or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GPT-5.5 and Qwen3.8 Max, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.5 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

GPT-5.5 is $5.00 and Qwen3.8 Max is $1.65 per million tokens, so Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper on this metric. GPT-5.5 is $30.00 and Qwen3.8 Max is $4.951 per million tokens, so Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, GPT-5.5 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

GPT-5.5 has the larger sourced context window. GPT-5.5 supports 1,050K and Qwen3.8 Max supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, GPT-5.5 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: The verified common benchmarks do not produce a majority winner.

Can GPT-5.5 or Qwen3.8 Max be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. GPT-5.5 is not marked open weight; Qwen3.8 Max is not marked open weight.

Can GPT-5.5 and Qwen3.8 Max understand images?+

GPT-5.5 is documented with image input; Qwen3.8 Max is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, GPT-5.5 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

Qwen3.8 Max has the larger sourced maximum output: GPT-5.5 supports 128K and Qwen3.8 Max supports 131K output tokens.

Do GPT-5.5 and Qwen3.8 Max support reasoning and tool use?+

GPT-5.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Qwen3.8 Max: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, GPT-5.5 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

GPT-5.5 has 2 sourced provider routes; Qwen3.8 Max has 4, so Qwen3.8 Max has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, GPT-5.5 or Qwen3.8 Max?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback