GPT-4o vs GPT-4o Mini
At a Glance
| Compare |  GPT-4oOpenAI | GPT-4o MiniOpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $1.25Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $0.075Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $5.00Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 | $0.30Openrouter ↗ · Sep 22, 2026 |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 128K | 128K |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | GPT-4o Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglotpolyglot-225-5dc9490bb35f · pass_rate_2 · leader | 23.11100% of row best · percent · diff; aider 0.70.1.dev | 3.5615% of row best · percent · whole; aider 0.69.2.dev |
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie | 1,282.45100% of row best · rating · gpt-4o-2024-08-06; 95% CI [1278.25455133, 1286.63762056]; votes 45499; rank 254 | 1,286.32100% of row best · rating · gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18; 95% CI [1282.80018045, 1289.83842881]; votes 68697; rank 249 |
| LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie | 1,064.56100% of row best · rating · gpt-4o-2024-08-06; 95% CI [1052.10383916, 1077.00692124]; votes 3376; rank 123 | 1,065.63100% of row best · rating · gpt-4o-mini-2024-07-18; 95% CI [1057.37402316, 1073.87669447]; votes 17341; rank 122 |
| ToneBench2026-09-11-10-task-4ef099199c9c · overall_score · unverified | 58.66100% of row best · points · GPT-4o · 1,174 output tokens / case | 58.1399% of row best · points · GPT-4o mini · 1,347 output tokens / case |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 2 ties | 1 benchmark winNo overall winner | 0 benchmark winsNo overall winner |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | GPT-4o | GPT-4o Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Family | Gpt 4o | Gpt 4o |
| Model | GPT-4o | GPT-4o Mini |
| Version | GPT-4o | GPT-4o Mini |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2023-10-01 | 2023-10-01 |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 128K | 128K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | chat, generation, tools |
GPT-4o Capabilities
GPT-4o Mini Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All image comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
GPT-4oOpenAI | vs | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | GPT-4oOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | GPT-4oOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | GPT-4oOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-4oOpenAI | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-4oOpenAI | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | vs | GPT-4oOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | GPT-4oOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-4oOpenAI | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
GPT-4oOpenAI | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | GPT-4oOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | GPT-4oOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
GPT-4o vs GPT-4o Mini FAQs
Is GPT-4o or GPT-4o Mini better for coding?+
GPT-4o leads the current coding subset with 1 benchmark win to 0. This describes only the matched benchmark rows shown above.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or GPT-4o Mini?+
GPT-4o is $1.25 and GPT-4o Mini is $0.075 per million tokens, so GPT-4o Mini is cheaper on this metric. GPT-4o is $5.00 and GPT-4o Mini is $0.30 per million tokens, so GPT-4o Mini is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, GPT-4o or GPT-4o Mini?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. GPT-4o is 128K and GPT-4o Mini is 128K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, GPT-4o or GPT-4o Mini?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.
Can GPT-4o or GPT-4o Mini be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. GPT-4o is not marked open weight; GPT-4o Mini is not marked open weight.
Can GPT-4o and GPT-4o Mini understand images?+
GPT-4o is documented with image input; GPT-4o Mini is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, GPT-4o or GPT-4o Mini?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. GPT-4o is 16K and GPT-4o Mini is 16K.
Do GPT-4o and GPT-4o Mini support reasoning and tool use?+
GPT-4o: tool calling and image input. GPT-4o Mini: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, GPT-4o or GPT-4o Mini?+
GPT-4o has 2 sourced provider routes; GPT-4o Mini has 2, a tie.
Which offers better value, GPT-4o or GPT-4o Mini?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.