GPT-4.1 Nano vs GLM 5.3
Model Markets Rankings
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
| Ranking | GPT-4.1 Nano | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate | UnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort | #28 of 36$0.248 per LiveBench case |
Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.
Benchmark Performance
Available Benchmarks
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 Nano | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader | 1,284.6487% of row best · rating · gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14; 95% CI [1276.99177350, 1292.27849322]; votes 6103; rank 246 | 1,474.49100% of row best · rating · glm-5.3-max; 95% CI [1467.12172899, 1481.86064533]; votes 7401; rank 18 |
| Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above | 0 benchmark wins | 1 benchmark winOverall lead |
Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.
Technical Differences
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | GPT-4.1 Nano | GLM-5.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | Z.ai |
| Family | Gpt 4 1 | Glm 5 3 |
| Model | GPT-4.1 Nano | GLM-5.3 |
| Version | GPT-4.1 Nano | GLM-5.3 |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | Unknown | Unknown |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-06-01 | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,048K | 1,000K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard) | Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard), Z.ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, tools | agents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools |
13 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate
GPT-4.1 Nano Capabilities
GLM 5.3 Capabilities
Internal Comparison Graph
Related Comparisons
| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
GPT-4.1 NanoOpenAI | vs | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | family variantsimage, text |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | GPT-4.1 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | GPT-4.1 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
 DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek | vs | GPT-4.1 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
GPT-4.1 NanoOpenAI | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-4.1 NanoOpenAI | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | vs | GPT-4.1 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | GPT-4.1 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
GPT-4.1 NanoOpenAI | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | GPT-4.1 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
 Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | vs | GPT-4.1 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
| vs | GPT-4.1 NanoOpenAI | cross-developer peersimage, text |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
GPT-4.1 Nano vs GLM 5.3 FAQs
Is GPT-4.1 Nano or GLM 5.3 better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GPT-4.1 Nano and GLM 5.3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Nano or GLM 5.3?+
GPT-4.1 Nano is $0.050 and GLM 5.3 is $1.20 per million tokens, so GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper on this metric. GPT-4.1 Nano is $0.20 and GLM 5.3 is $4.00 per million tokens, so GPT-4.1 Nano is cheaper on this metric.
Which has a larger context window, GPT-4.1 Nano or GLM 5.3?+
GPT-4.1 Nano has the larger sourced context window. GPT-4.1 Nano supports 1,048K and GLM 5.3 supports 1,000K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, GPT-4.1 Nano or GLM 5.3?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can GPT-4.1 Nano or GLM 5.3 be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. GPT-4.1 Nano is not marked open weight; GLM 5.3 is not marked open weight.
Can GPT-4.1 Nano and GLM 5.3 understand images?+
GPT-4.1 Nano is documented with image input; GLM 5.3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, GPT-4.1 Nano or GLM 5.3?+
GLM 5.3 has the larger sourced maximum output: GPT-4.1 Nano supports 33K and GLM 5.3 supports 131K output tokens.
Do GPT-4.1 Nano and GLM 5.3 support reasoning and tool use?+
GPT-4.1 Nano: tool calling and image input. GLM 5.3: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, GPT-4.1 Nano or GLM 5.3?+
GPT-4.1 Nano has 2 sourced provider routes; GLM 5.3 has 4, so GLM 5.3 has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, GPT-4.1 Nano or GLM 5.3?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.