GPT-4.1 Mini vs Grok 4.6

Model Markets Rankings

Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency

All rankings →
RankingGPT-4.1 MiniGrok 4.6
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v1.2UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort#13 of 2267.6 score
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 36-model eligible cohort#18 of 36$0.097 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.0UnrankedNot in the 22-model eligible cohort#8 of 2256.6 score

Ranks come from the current complete eligible cohorts. Green highlights appear only when both models are ranked in the same metric. Missing required inputs remain unranked, and the three dimensions are not collapsed into an overall winner.

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

BenchmarkGPT-4.1 MiniGrok 4.6
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-01-011508720696 · arena_rating · leader1,340.0993% of row best · rating · gpt-4.1-mini-2025-04-14; 95% CI [1335.78819641, 1344.39628941]; votes 38630; rank 1951,443.75100% of row best · rating · grok-4.6-high; 95% CI [1433.62910542, 1453.86294509]; votes 3453; rank 55
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above0 benchmark wins1 benchmark winOverall lead

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

FieldAt a Glance
OpenAI · activeGPT-4.1 MiniVerified Aug 29, 2026
xAI · activeGrok 4.6Verified Aug 29, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldGPT-4.1 MiniGrok 4.6
DeveloperOpenAIxAI
FamilyGpt 4 1Grok 4
ModelGPT-4.1 MiniGrok 4.6
VersionGPT-4.1 MiniGrok 4.6
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknownUnknown
Knowledge cutoff2024-06-012026-02-01
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,048K500K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessOpenai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)Xai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

14 comparable fields · 8 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

GPT-4.1 Mini Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Input price$0.20
Output price$0.80
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-4.1-mini

Grok 4.6 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Input price$2.00
Output price$6.00
Serving providers1
Canonical IDxai/grok-4.6

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All image comparisons →
APairBContext
vsfamily variantsimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

GPT-4.1 Mini vs Grok 4.6 FAQs

Is GPT-4.1 Mini or Grok 4.6 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both GPT-4.1 Mini and Grok 4.6, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 Mini or Grok 4.6?+

GPT-4.1 Mini is $0.20 and Grok 4.6 is $2.00 per million tokens, so GPT-4.1 Mini is cheaper on this metric. GPT-4.1 Mini is $0.80 and Grok 4.6 is $6.00 per million tokens, so GPT-4.1 Mini is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, GPT-4.1 Mini or Grok 4.6?+

GPT-4.1 Mini has the larger sourced context window. GPT-4.1 Mini supports 1,048K and Grok 4.6 supports 500K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, GPT-4.1 Mini or Grok 4.6?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can GPT-4.1 Mini or Grok 4.6 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. GPT-4.1 Mini is not marked open weight; Grok 4.6 is not marked open weight.

Can GPT-4.1 Mini and Grok 4.6 understand images?+

GPT-4.1 Mini is documented with image input; Grok 4.6 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, GPT-4.1 Mini or Grok 4.6?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. GPT-4.1 Mini is 33K and Grok 4.6 is —.

Do GPT-4.1 Mini and Grok 4.6 support reasoning and tool use?+

GPT-4.1 Mini: tool calling and image input. Grok 4.6: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, GPT-4.1 Mini or Grok 4.6?+

GPT-4.1 Mini has 2 sourced provider routes; Grok 4.6 has 1, so GPT-4.1 Mini has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, GPT-4.1 Mini or Grok 4.6?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback