Gemma 4 26B A4B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

At a Glance

Compare
Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogle DeepMind
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.070Deepinfra · Sep 22, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.30Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K1,049K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B-A4BNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,434.47100% of row best · rating · gemma-4-26b-a4b; 95% CI [1426.87673667, 1442.06986887]; votes 5804; rank 801,330.7293% of row best · rating · nvidia-nemotron-3.5-lightning-30b-a3b-nvfp4; 95% CI [1323.44362436, 1337.99938875]; votes 8338; rank 213
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGemma 4 26B-A4BNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindNVIDIA
FamilyGemma 4Nvidia Nemotron 3 5 Lightning
ModelGemma 4 26B-A4BNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
VersionGemma 4 26B-A4BNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-03-112026-08-11
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K1,049K
Total parameters26B30B
Active parameters4B3B
Licenseapache-2.0openmdw-1.1
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Fireworks Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolsagents, chat, generation, reasoning, tools

Gemma 4 26B A4B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers4
Canonical IDgoogle/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDnvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-BF16

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B FAQs

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemma 4 26B A4B and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

Only Gemma 4 26B A4B has a directly sourced input price: $0.070 per million tokens. Only Gemma 4 26B A4B has a directly sourced output price: $0.30 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 26B A4B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has the larger sourced context window. Gemma 4 26B A4B supports 262K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B supports 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemma 4 26B A4B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Gemma 4 26B A4B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Gemma 4 26B A4B is open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is open weight.

Can Gemma 4 26B A4B and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B understand images?+

Gemma 4 26B A4B is documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemma 4 26B A4B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemma 4 26B A4B is — and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is —.

Do Gemma 4 26B A4B and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemma 4 26B A4B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemma 4 26B A4B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

Gemma 4 26B A4B has 4 sourced provider routes; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has 1, so Gemma 4 26B A4B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemma 4 26B A4B or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback