Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Mistral Medium 3.5 128B

At a Glance

Compare
Gemma 4 26B A4BGoogle DeepMind
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.070Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.30Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K262K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B-A4BMistral-Medium-3.5-128B
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · statistical tie1,434.47100% of row best · rating · gemma-4-26b-a4b; 95% CI [1426.87673667, 1442.06986887]; votes 5804; rank 801,420.5899% of row best · rating · mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1414.04225396, 1427.11615611]; votes 10996; rank 104
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,258.90100% of row best · rating · gemma-4-26b-a4b; 95% CI [1252.23205561, 1265.56747875]; votes 22658; rank 471,222.0597% of row best · rating · mistral-medium-3.5; 95% CI [1212.30064904, 1231.79518832]; votes 5090; rank 71
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above · 1 tie1 benchmark winNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGemma 4 26B-A4BMistral-Medium-3.5-128B
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindMistral AI
FamilyGemma 4Mistral Medium 3 5 128b
ModelGemma 4 26B-A4BMistral-Medium-3.5-128B
VersionGemma 4 26B-A4BMistral-Medium-3.5-128B
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-03-11Unknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, ImageText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K262K
Total parameters26B127.7B
Active parameters4BUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0other
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessDeepinfra (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard), Openrouter (Standard), Together Ai (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

Gemma 4 26B A4B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers4
Canonical IDgoogle/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it

Mistral Medium 3.5 128B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmistralai/Mistral-Medium-3.5-128B

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Mistral Medium 3.5 128B FAQs

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

Only Gemma 4 26B A4B has a directly sourced input price: $0.070 per million tokens. Only Gemma 4 26B A4B has a directly sourced output price: $0.30 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Gemma 4 26B A4B is 262K and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Gemma 4 26B A4B or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Gemma 4 26B A4B is open weight; Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is open weight.

Can Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B understand images?+

Gemma 4 26B A4B is documented with image input; Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemma 4 26B A4B is — and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B is —.

Do Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemma 4 26B A4B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Mistral Medium 3.5 128B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

Gemma 4 26B A4B has 4 sourced provider routes; Mistral Medium 3.5 128B has 0, so Gemma 4 26B A4B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback