Gemma 4 12B vs Phi-4 Reasoning

Benchmark Performance

Available Benchmarks

No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.
FieldAt a Glance
Google DeepMind · activeGemma 4 12BVerified Sep 3, 2026
Microsoft · activePhi-4 ReasoningVerified Aug 28, 2026

Technical Differences

Side-by-Side Facts

Indexable
FieldGemma 4 12BPhi-4-reasoning
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindMicrosoft
FamilyGemma 4Phi 4 Reasoning
ModelGemma 4 12BPhi-4-reasoning
VersionGemma 4 12BPhi-4-reasoning
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-05-232025-04-30
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, AudioText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K33K
Total parameters12B14.7B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0mit
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessTogether Ai (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning

14 comparable fields · 10 material differences · Pair passes the primary-source comparison gate

Gemma 4 12B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Input price
Output price
Serving providers1
Canonical IDgoogle/gemma-4-12B-it

Phi-4 Reasoning Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoning
Input price
Output price
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmicrosoft/Phi-4-reasoning

Internal Comparison Graph

Related Comparisons

All text comparisons →
APairBContext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vsdeveloper peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peersimage, text
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peerstext
vscross-developer peersimage, text, video
vscross-developer peersimage, text

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemma 4 12B vs Phi-4 Reasoning FAQs

Is Gemma 4 12B or Phi-4 Reasoning better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemma 4 12B and Phi-4 Reasoning, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 12B or Phi-4 Reasoning?+

Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.

Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 12B or Phi-4 Reasoning?+

Gemma 4 12B has the larger sourced context window. Gemma 4 12B supports 262K and Phi-4 Reasoning supports 33K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemma 4 12B or Phi-4 Reasoning?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Gemma 4 12B or Phi-4 Reasoning be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Gemma 4 12B is open weight; Phi-4 Reasoning is open weight.

Can Gemma 4 12B and Phi-4 Reasoning understand images?+

Gemma 4 12B is documented with image input; Phi-4 Reasoning is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemma 4 12B or Phi-4 Reasoning?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemma 4 12B is — and Phi-4 Reasoning is —.

Do Gemma 4 12B and Phi-4 Reasoning support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemma 4 12B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Phi-4 Reasoning: reasoning. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemma 4 12B or Phi-4 Reasoning?+

Gemma 4 12B has 1 sourced provider route; Phi-4 Reasoning has 0, so Gemma 4 12B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemma 4 12B or Phi-4 Reasoning?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback