Gemma 4 12B vs Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct

At a Glance

Compare
Gemma 4 12BGoogle DeepMind
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K131K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGemma 4 12BPhi-4-multimodal-instruct
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindMicrosoft
FamilyGemma 4Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct
ModelGemma 4 12BPhi-4-multimodal-instruct
VersionGemma 4 12BPhi-4-multimodal-instruct
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-05-232025-02-26
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, AudioText, Image, Audio
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K131K
Total parameters12B5.6B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0mit
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesUnknown
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessTogether Ai (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation

Gemma 4 12B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDgoogle/gemma-4-12B-it

Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct Capabilities

chatgeneration
Serving providers0
Canonical IDmicrosoft/Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemma 4 12B vs Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct FAQs

Is Gemma 4 12B or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemma 4 12B and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 12B or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+

Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.

Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 12B or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+

Gemma 4 12B has the larger sourced context window. Gemma 4 12B supports 262K and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct supports 131K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemma 4 12B or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Gemma 4 12B or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Gemma 4 12B is open weight; Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct is open weight.

Can Gemma 4 12B and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct understand images?+

Gemma 4 12B is documented with image input; Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemma 4 12B or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemma 4 12B is — and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct is —.

Do Gemma 4 12B and Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemma 4 12B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct: image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemma 4 12B or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+

Gemma 4 12B has 1 sourced provider route; Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct has 0, so Gemma 4 12B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemma 4 12B or Phi-4 Multimodal Instruct?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback