Gemma 4 12B vs Kimi K2.5

At a Glance

Compare
Gemma 4 12BGoogle DeepMind
Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$0.45Deepinfra · Aug 29, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$2.25Deepinfra · Aug 29, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K262K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGemma 4 12BKimi-K2.5
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindMoonshot AI
FamilyGemma 4Kimi K2 5
ModelGemma 4 12BKimi-K2.5
VersionGemma 4 12BKimi-K2.5
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-05-232026-01-27
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, AudioText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K262K
Total parameters12B1T
Active parametersUnknown32B
Licenseapache-2.0other
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessTogether Ai (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Hugging Face (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools

Gemma 4 12B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDgoogle/gemma-4-12B-it

Kimi K2.5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers3
Canonical IDmoonshotai/Kimi-K2.5

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemma 4 12B vs Kimi K2.5 FAQs

Is Gemma 4 12B or Kimi K2.5 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemma 4 12B and Kimi K2.5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 12B or Kimi K2.5?+

Only Kimi K2.5 has a directly sourced input price: $0.45 per million tokens. Only Kimi K2.5 has a directly sourced output price: $2.25 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 12B or Kimi K2.5?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Gemma 4 12B is 262K and Kimi K2.5 is 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemma 4 12B or Kimi K2.5?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Gemma 4 12B or Kimi K2.5 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Gemma 4 12B is open weight; Kimi K2.5 is open weight.

Can Gemma 4 12B and Kimi K2.5 understand images?+

Gemma 4 12B is documented with image input; Kimi K2.5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemma 4 12B or Kimi K2.5?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemma 4 12B is — and Kimi K2.5 is —.

Do Gemma 4 12B and Kimi K2.5 support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemma 4 12B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Kimi K2.5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemma 4 12B or Kimi K2.5?+

Gemma 4 12B has 1 sourced provider route; Kimi K2.5 has 3, so Kimi K2.5 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemma 4 12B or Kimi K2.5?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback