Gemma 4 12B vs Bonsai 27B

At a Glance

Compare
Gemma 4 12BGoogle DeepMind
Bonsai 27BPrismML
Pricing and Limits
Context windowMaximum documented tokens262K262K
Model facts checkedSep 3, 2026View model evidence →Sep 18, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGemma 4 12BBonsai 27B
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindPrismML
FamilyGemma 4Bonsai 27b
ModelGemma 4 12BBonsai 27B
VersionGemma 4 12BBonsai 27B
Lifecycleactiveactive
Released2026-05-232026-07-04
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, AudioText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window262K262K
Total parameters12B27B
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
Licenseapache-2.0apache-2.0
Open weightsYesYes
API availableYesNo
Self-hostableYesYes
Provider accessTogether Ai (Standard)Unknown
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, toolschat, generation, reasoning, tools, vision
Base modelUnknownQwen3.6 27B
Effective bit widthUnknown1 bit per weight
Language model sizeUnknown3.53 GiB
Weight formatUnknownBinary Q1_0

Gemma 4 12B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDgoogle/gemma-4-12B-it

Bonsai 27B Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtoolsvision
Serving providers0
Canonical IDprism-ml/Bonsai-27B

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemma 4 12B vs Bonsai 27B FAQs

Is Gemma 4 12B or Bonsai 27B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemma 4 12B and Bonsai 27B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 12B or Bonsai 27B?+

Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.

Which has a larger context window, Gemma 4 12B or Bonsai 27B?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Gemma 4 12B is 262K and Bonsai 27B is 262K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemma 4 12B or Bonsai 27B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Gemma 4 12B or Bonsai 27B be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: supported. Gemma 4 12B is open weight; Bonsai 27B is open weight.

Can Gemma 4 12B and Bonsai 27B understand images?+

Gemma 4 12B is documented with image input; Bonsai 27B is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemma 4 12B or Bonsai 27B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemma 4 12B is — and Bonsai 27B is —.

Do Gemma 4 12B and Bonsai 27B support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemma 4 12B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Bonsai 27B: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemma 4 12B or Bonsai 27B?+

Gemma 4 12B has 1 sourced provider route; Bonsai 27B has 0, so Gemma 4 12B has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemma 4 12B or Bonsai 27B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback