Gemini Deep Research vs GLM 5.3

At a Glance

Compare
Gemini Deep ResearchGoogle DeepMind
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#16 of 4670.4 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 46.9–80.3
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimateUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort#34 of 44$0.248 per LiveBench case
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5UnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort#26 of 3850.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing ARC-AGI-2 · full-core range 38.2–54.9
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$1.20Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokensNot reported$4.00Deepinfra · Sep 21, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Aug 29, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
No Protocol-Matched Benchmark Yet.Results appear here only when both models share the same benchmark version, metric, evaluation protocol, and evidence class.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGemini Deep ResearchGLM-5.3
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindZ.ai
FamilyGemini AgentsGlm 5 3
ModelGemini Deep ResearchGLM-5.3
VersionGemini Deep ResearchGLM-5.3
Lifecyclepreviewactive
ReleasedUnknownUnknown
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, Audio, DocumentText
Output modalitiesText, ImageText
Context window1,049K1,000K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessGoogle AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)Deepinfra (Standard), Fireworks Ai (Standard), Together Ai (Standard), Z.ai (Standard)
Capabilitiesgeneration, reasoning, research, toolsagents, chat, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Gemini Deep Research Capabilities

generationreasoningresearchtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/deep-research-preview-04-2026

GLM 5.3 Capabilities

agentschatreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers4
Canonical IDzai-org/glm-5.3

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemini Deep Research vs GLM 5.3 FAQs

Is Gemini Deep Research or GLM 5.3 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini Deep Research and GLM 5.3, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemini Deep Research or GLM 5.3?+

Only GLM 5.3 has a directly sourced input price: $1.20 per million tokens. Only GLM 5.3 has a directly sourced output price: $4.00 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini Deep Research or GLM 5.3?+

Gemini Deep Research has the larger sourced context window. Gemini Deep Research supports 1,049K and GLM 5.3 supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini Deep Research or GLM 5.3?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Gemini Deep Research or GLM 5.3 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini Deep Research is not marked open weight; GLM 5.3 is not marked open weight.

Can Gemini Deep Research and GLM 5.3 understand images?+

Gemini Deep Research is documented with image input; GLM 5.3 is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemini Deep Research or GLM 5.3?+

GLM 5.3 has the larger sourced maximum output: Gemini Deep Research supports 66K and GLM 5.3 supports 131K output tokens.

Do Gemini Deep Research and GLM 5.3 support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemini Deep Research: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GLM 5.3: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini Deep Research or GLM 5.3?+

Gemini Deep Research has 2 sourced provider routes; GLM 5.3 has 4, so GLM 5.3 has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemini Deep Research or GLM 5.3?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback