Gemini 3 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct

At a Glance

Compare
Gemini 3 FlashGoogle DeepMind
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.50Google AI · Aug 29, 2026$0.1875Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$3.00Google AI · Aug 29, 2026$0.6525Openrouter · Sep 22, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,000K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Aug 28, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkGemini 3 FlashLlama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,442.40100% of row best · rating · gemini-3-flash (thinking-minimal); 95% CI [1439.30492660, 1445.49388279]; votes 85799; rank 611,287.1789% of row best · rating · llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct; 95% CI [1282.91290700, 1291.42929740]; votes 39359; rank 247
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,265.37100% of row best · rating · gemini-3-flash (thinking-minimal); 95% CI [1259.84136462, 1270.89646969]; votes 34860; rank 411,141.5790% of row best · rating · llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct; 95% CI [1132.52682180, 1150.61627536]; votes 6937; rank 106
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above2 benchmark winsNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGemini 3 FlashLlama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindMeta
FamilyGemini 3Llama 4 Maverick 17b 128e Instruct
ModelGemini 3 FlashLlama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct
VersionGemini 3 FlashLlama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct
Lifecyclepreviewactive
ReleasedUnknown2025-04-05
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, Audio, DocumentText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,000K
Total parametersUnknown401.6B
Active parametersUnknown17B
LicenseUnknownother
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessGoogle AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, tools

Gemini 3 Flash Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/gemini-3-flash-preview

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct Capabilities

chatgenerationtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDmeta-llama/Llama-4-Maverick-17B-128E-Instruct

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemini 3 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct FAQs

Is Gemini 3 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct?+

Gemini 3 Flash is $0.50 and Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is $0.1875 per million tokens, so Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is cheaper on this metric. Gemini 3 Flash is $3.00 and Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is $0.6525 per million tokens, so Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct?+

Gemini 3 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 3 Flash supports 1,049K and Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct supports 1,000K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Gemini 3 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct be self-hosted?+

Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Gemini 3 Flash is not marked open weight; Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is open weight.

Can Gemini 3 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct understand images?+

Gemini 3 Flash is documented with image input; Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 3 Flash is 66K and Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct is —.

Do Gemini 3 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemini 3 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct: tool calling and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct?+

Gemini 3 Flash has 2 sourced provider routes; Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct has 1, so Gemini 3 Flash has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemini 3 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick 17B 128E Instruct?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback