Gemini 3 Flash vs GPT-5

At a Glance

Compare
Gemini 3 FlashGoogle DeepMind
GPT-5OpenAI
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5UnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort#41 of 4615.0 score · 2/3 sources · provisional · missing LiveBench · full-core range 10.0–43.3
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.50Google AI · Aug 29, 2026$0.625Openrouter · Sep 3, 2026
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$3.00Google AI · Aug 29, 2026$5.00Openrouter · Sep 3, 2026
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K400K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkGemini 3 FlashGPT-5
LMArena Search Arenasearch-2026-08-24-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,198.09100% of row best · rating · gemini-3-flash-grounding; 95% CI [1193.35426288, 1202.82591975]; votes 149334; rank 151,132.7795% of row best · rating · gpt-5-search; 95% CI [1126.91788409, 1138.61733849]; votes 20781; rank 30
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,442.40100% of row best · rating · gemini-3-flash (thinking-minimal); 95% CI [1439.30492660, 1445.49388279]; votes 85799; rank 611,406.0697% of row best · rating · gpt-5-high; 95% CI [1401.61960044, 1410.50585480]; votes 31428; rank 136
LMArena Vision Arenavision-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,265.37100% of row best · rating · gemini-3-flash (thinking-minimal); 95% CI [1259.84136462, 1270.89646969]; votes 34860; rank 411,209.2296% of row best · rating · gpt-5-high; 95% CI [1202.34954059, 1216.08580885]; votes 34351; rank 76
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above3 benchmark winsNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGemini 3 FlashGPT-5
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindOpenAI
FamilyGemini 3Gpt 5
ModelGemini 3 FlashGPT-5
VersionGemini 3 FlashGPT-5
Lifecyclepreviewactive
ReleasedUnknown2025-08-07
Knowledge cutoffUnknown2024-09-30
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, Audio, DocumentText, Image
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K400K
Total parametersUnknownUnknown
Active parametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseUnknownUnknown
Open weightsNoNo
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoNo
Provider accessGoogle AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)Openai (Standard), Openrouter (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolschat, generation, reasoning, structured_outputs, tools

Gemini 3 Flash Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/gemini-3-flash-preview

GPT-5 Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningstructured outputstools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDopenai/gpt-5

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemini 3 Flash vs GPT-5 FAQs

Is Gemini 3 Flash or GPT-5 better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3 Flash and GPT-5, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash or GPT-5?+

Gemini 3 Flash is $0.50 and GPT-5 is $0.625 per million tokens, so Gemini 3 Flash is cheaper on this metric. Gemini 3 Flash is $3.00 and GPT-5 is $5.00 per million tokens, so Gemini 3 Flash is cheaper on this metric.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3 Flash or GPT-5?+

Gemini 3 Flash has the larger sourced context window. Gemini 3 Flash supports 1,049K and GPT-5 supports 400K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3 Flash or GPT-5?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: An overall winner requires at least two decisive benchmarks from at least two original publishers.

Can Gemini 3 Flash or GPT-5 be self-hosted?+

Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 3 Flash is not marked open weight; GPT-5 is not marked open weight.

Can Gemini 3 Flash and GPT-5 understand images?+

Gemini 3 Flash is documented with image input; GPT-5 is documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3 Flash or GPT-5?+

GPT-5 has the larger sourced maximum output: Gemini 3 Flash supports 66K and GPT-5 supports 128K output tokens.

Do Gemini 3 Flash and GPT-5 support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemini 3 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. GPT-5: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3 Flash or GPT-5?+

Gemini 3 Flash has 2 sourced provider routes; GPT-5 has 2, a tie.

Which offers better value, Gemini 3 Flash or GPT-5?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback