Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
At a Glance
| Compare | Gemini 3 FlashGoogle DeepMind | Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle DeepMind |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $0.50Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | Not reported |
| Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens | $3.00Google AI ↗ · Aug 29, 2026 | Not reported |
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | 1,049K | Not reported |
| Model facts checked | Aug 29, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 2, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemini 3 Flash | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | Google DeepMind |
| Family | Gemini 3 | Gemini 3 |
| Model | Gemini 3 Flash | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber |
| Version | Gemini 3 Flash | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber |
| Lifecycle | preview | active |
| Released | Unknown | 2026-09-02 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text, Image, Video, Audio, Document | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | 1,049K | Unknown |
| Total parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| Active parameters | Unknown | Unknown |
| License | Unknown | Unknown |
| Open weights | No | No |
| API available | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | No | No |
| Provider access | Google AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard) | Unknown |
| Capabilities | chat, generation, reasoning, tools | automated-patching, cybersecurity, reasoning, vulnerability-detection |
Gemini 3 Flash Capabilities
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber Capabilities
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemini 3 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber FAQs
Is Gemini 3 Flash or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3 Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3 Flash or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
Only Gemini 3 Flash has a directly sourced input price: $0.50 per million tokens. Only Gemini 3 Flash has a directly sourced output price: $3.00 per million tokens.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3 Flash or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Gemini 3 Flash is 1,049K and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is —.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3 Flash or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Gemini 3 Flash or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber be self-hosted?+
Both models have the same recorded self-hosting status: unsupported. Gemini 3 Flash is not marked open weight; Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is not marked open weight.
Can Gemini 3 Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber understand images?+
Gemini 3 Flash is documented with image input; Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3 Flash or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 3 Flash is 66K and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is —.
Do Gemini 3 Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemini 3 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber: reasoning. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3 Flash or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
Gemini 3 Flash has 2 sourced provider routes; Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber has 0, so Gemini 3 Flash has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemini 3 Flash or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.