Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B
At a Glance
| Compare |  Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle DeepMind | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing and Limits | ||
| Context windowMaximum documented tokens | Not reported | 1,049K |
| Model facts checked | Sep 2, 2026View model evidence → | Sep 3, 2026View model evidence → |
Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →
Available Benchmarks
Side-by-Side Facts
| Field | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Google DeepMind | NVIDIA |
| Family | Gemini 3 | Nvidia Nemotron 3 5 Lightning |
| Model | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B |
| Version | Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber | NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B |
| Lifecycle | active | active |
| Released | 2026-09-02 | 2026-08-11 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Unknown | Unknown |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
| Output modalities | Text | Text |
| Context window | Unknown | 1,049K |
| Total parameters | Unknown | 30B |
| Active parameters | Unknown | 3B |
| License | Unknown | openmdw-1.1 |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| API available | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
| Provider access | Unknown | Fireworks Ai (Standard) |
| Capabilities | automated-patching, cybersecurity, reasoning, vulnerability-detection | agents, chat, generation, reasoning, tools |
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber Capabilities
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B Capabilities
Related Comparisons
All text comparisons →| A | Pair | B | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GPT-6 AstraOpenAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Claude Fable 5.1Anthropic | vs | Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.1 ProGoogle DeepMind | vs | Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle DeepMind | family variantstext |
 DeepSeek-V4.1-FlashDeepSeek | vs | Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle DeepMind | vs | Grok 4.6xAI | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Qwen3.8-MaxQwen | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Kimi-K3Moonshot AI | cross-developer peerstext |
 MiniMax-M3MiniMax | vs | Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle DeepMind | vs |  GLM-5.3Z.ai | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Hy4 previewTencent | cross-developer peerstext |
Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | vs | Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle DeepMind | cross-developer peerstext |
Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberGoogle DeepMind | vs |  Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | cross-developer peerstext |
Primary Evidence
Sources and Freshness
Questions
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B FAQs
Is Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B better for coding?+
This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+
Neither model has a directly sourced input price in this comparison. Neither model has a directly sourced output price in this comparison.
Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+
Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is — and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is 1,049K.
Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+
There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.
Can Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B be self-hosted?+
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is not marked open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is open weight.
Can Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B understand images?+
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is not documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.
Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+
Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is — and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is —.
Do Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B support reasoning and tool use?+
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber: reasoning. NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.
Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber has 0 sourced provider routes; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has 1, so NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has broader tracked availability.
Which offers better value, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+
There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.