Gemini 3.7 Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

At a Glance

Compare
Gemini 3.7 FlashGoogle DeepMind
Intelligence, Cost, and Efficiency
IntelligenceHigher is better · MM Intelligence v2.5#4 of 4687.7 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 46-model eligible cohort
CostLower is better · Published-token output estimate#17 of 44$0.085 per LiveBench caseUnrankedNot in the 44-model eligible cohort
EfficiencyHigher is better · MM Efficiency v1.5#2 of 3869.9 score · 3/3 sources · completeUnrankedNot in the 38-model eligible cohort
Pricing and Limits
Input priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$0.75Google AI · Aug 29, 2026Not reported
Output priceFrom · USD / 1M tokens$3.75Google AI · Aug 29, 2026Not reported
Context windowMaximum documented tokens1,049K1,049K
Model facts checkedAug 29, 2026View model evidence →Sep 3, 2026View model evidence →

Token prices are the lowest available sourced USD rates; input and output may use different providers. Cost ranking estimates output spend on LiveBench, not a full request bill. Ranking methodology →

Available Benchmarks

All benchmark results →
BenchmarkGemini 3.7 FlashNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
LMArena Text Arenatext-2026-09-13-d25aabda0010 · arena_rating · leader1,490.49100% of row best · rating · gemini-3.7-flash-high; 95% CI [1482.31296820, 1498.67106273]; votes 5640; rank 81,330.7289% of row best · rating · nvidia-nemotron-3.5-lightning-30b-a3b-nvfp4; 95% CI [1323.44362436, 1337.99938875]; votes 8338; rank 213
Overall ResultCounted from the protocol-matched rows above1 benchmark winNo overall winner0 benchmark winsNo overall winner

Third-party benchmark Only like-for-like primary-publisher results are shown; raw scores, relative scores, configuration, and token spend remain visible.

Side-by-Side Facts

FieldGemini 3.7 FlashNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
DeveloperGoogle DeepMindNVIDIA
FamilyGemini 3Nvidia Nemotron 3 5 Lightning
ModelGemini 3.7 FlashNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
VersionGemini 3.7 FlashNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
Lifecycleactiveactive
ReleasedUnknown2026-08-11
Knowledge cutoffUnknownUnknown
Input modalitiesText, Image, Video, Audio, DocumentText
Output modalitiesTextText
Context window1,049K1,049K
Total parametersUnknown30B
Active parametersUnknown3B
LicenseUnknownopenmdw-1.1
Open weightsNoYes
API availableYesYes
Self-hostableNoYes
Provider accessGoogle AI (Standard), Google Gemini (Standard)Fireworks Ai (Standard)
Capabilitieschat, generation, reasoning, toolsagents, chat, generation, reasoning, tools

Gemini 3.7 Flash Capabilities

chatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers2
Canonical IDgoogle-deepmind/gemini-3.7-flash

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B Capabilities

agentschatgenerationreasoningtools
Serving providers1
Canonical IDnvidia/NVIDIA-Nemotron-3.5-Lightning-30B-A3B-BF16

Primary Evidence

Sources and Freshness

Questions

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B FAQs

Is Gemini 3.7 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B better for coding?+

This comparison does not currently contain a protocol-matched coding benchmark for both Gemini 3.7 Flash and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B, so Model Markets cannot name a coding leader from pricing, context size, or capability labels alone.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.7 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

Only Gemini 3.7 Flash has a directly sourced input price: $0.75 per million tokens. Only Gemini 3.7 Flash has a directly sourced output price: $3.75 per million tokens.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.7 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

Neither model has a larger sourced context window in this comparison. Gemini 3.7 Flash is 1,049K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is 1,049K.

Which performs better in benchmarks, Gemini 3.7 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

There is no overall benchmark winner: At least two independently verified, protocol-matched benchmarks are required for an overall winner.

Can Gemini 3.7 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B be self-hosted?+

NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is the only model in this pair currently marked as self-hostable. Gemini 3.7 Flash is not marked open weight; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is open weight.

Can Gemini 3.7 Flash and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B understand images?+

Gemini 3.7 Flash is documented with image input; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is not documented with image input. This reflects supported input modalities, not vision quality.

Which can generate longer answers, Gemini 3.7 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

Neither has a larger sourced maximum output. Gemini 3.7 Flash is 66K and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B is —.

Do Gemini 3.7 Flash and NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B support reasoning and tool use?+

Gemini 3.7 Flash: reasoning, tool calling, and image input. NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B: reasoning and tool calling. Feature support does not establish relative quality.

Which is available from more inference providers, Gemini 3.7 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

Gemini 3.7 Flash has 2 sourced provider routes; NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B has 1, so Gemini 3.7 Flash has broader tracked availability.

Which offers better value, Gemini 3.7 Flash or NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B?+

There is no universal value winner. Compare the input and output prices above with the matched benchmark result for your workload: cheaper tokens can be offset by different quality, token usage, latency, or provider availability.

Send Feedback